2017
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrx049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent in vivo cytogenetic effects of radioiodine therapy: a 21-year follow-up study using multicolor FISH

Abstract: Our previous studies demonstrated the cytogenetic effects in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of a 34-year-old male patient who received ablative radioactive 131iodine therapy (RIT) on two different occasions in 1992 and 1994. Assessment of RIT-induced chromosomal damage by the cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay (CBMN) showed the persistence of elevated micronucleus frequency in this patient for more than two decades since the first RIT. Subsequent cytogenetic analysis performed in 2012 revealed both stabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Procedure for the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique using peptide nucleic acid (PNA) based human telomeric and centromeric DNA probes was essentially the same as described in our previous studies [39, 40]. A cocktail of probe specific for human chromosomes 1, 2 and 4 was obtained from MetaSystems and the FISH procedure using this probe was performed essentially as described by the manufacturers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Procedure for the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique using peptide nucleic acid (PNA) based human telomeric and centromeric DNA probes was essentially the same as described in our previous studies [39, 40]. A cocktail of probe specific for human chromosomes 1, 2 and 4 was obtained from MetaSystems and the FISH procedure using this probe was performed essentially as described by the manufacturers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cocktail of probe specific for human chromosomes 1, 2 and 4 was obtained from MetaSystems and the FISH procedure using this probe was performed essentially as described by the manufacturers. The mFISH technique was performed essentially as described before [39]. Briefly, slides were treated for 1 min with 0.001% acidic pepsin solution (0.01NHCl) at 37°C for 1–2 min followed by two washes of 5 min each in phosphate-buffered saline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of micronucleus was 10 times higher 5 years after treatment than the number of micronucleus before treatment (11). In their study published in 2017, they examined the same patient's peripheral blood sample by multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization and found a higher proportion of reciprocal and non-reciprocal translocations compared with their previous study (33). These findings show the persistent effects of IR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Considering the half-life of 131 I (ranging from 1 to 8 days in thyroidectomized and non-thyroidectomized TC patients, respectively) [ 28 ] and of circulating lymphocytes (about 3 years) [ 28 , 38 ], such repeated demonstration of persistent cytogenetic damage is somehow surprising and challenge the widely held views about the mechanisms of IR-induced DNA damage. Possible explanations for the long-term genomic instability of lymphocytes from 131 I-exposed subjects include the introduction, upon irradiation, of DNA damage and cytogenetic alterations (1) in a subset of long-lived naïve T lymphocytes, quiescent cells that survive for prolonged periods of time in a resting stage, retaining the initially inflicted DNA damage and expressing it as micronuclei when stimulated to proliferate in the CBMN assay [ 38 , 42 , 43 ], (2) in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells that, through clonal expansion, may give rise to mature T lymphocytes with stable and unstable aberrations, perpetuating genomic instability in time (transgenerational effect) [ 38 , 42 , 43 ], and (3) in non-irradiated lymphocytes (a delayed non-targeted effect), as a result of the long-term production and plasma secretion of soluble clastogenic factors by irradiated cells (oxidative stress by-products such as ROS (reactive oxygen species) and inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α) that may further extend IR-induced cytogenetic damage in time (“bystander effect”) [ 44 ]. The two latter explanations are generally favored, as a large number of studies exist demonstrating either the high frequency of gene mutations and chromosomal aberrations in the progeny of irradiated cells or the production and plasma release of factors with clastogenic activity by irradiated cells (including one on 131 I-treated patients) [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%