1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(79)90002-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent müllerian duct structures in cryptorchid male infants: Surgical dilemmas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

1981
1981
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors believe that excision of müllerian duct structures and scrotal orchidopexy are not possible without sacrificing the vasa deferentia. 2 In our patient, it was possible to dissect the vasa deferentia from the rudimentary uterus and vagina, perform scrotal orchidopexy and excision of müllerian duct structures without risking the vas deferens. We believe that every effort should be made to preserve the vas deferens and testes for possible future fertility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some authors believe that excision of müllerian duct structures and scrotal orchidopexy are not possible without sacrificing the vasa deferentia. 2 In our patient, it was possible to dissect the vasa deferentia from the rudimentary uterus and vagina, perform scrotal orchidopexy and excision of müllerian duct structures without risking the vas deferens. We believe that every effort should be made to preserve the vas deferens and testes for possible future fertility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, the malignancy incidence appears to be similar to that of a normal cryptorchid child. 2,10,11 In conclusion, a conservative surgical approach for this rare syndrome in the form of orchidopexy and partial excision of the müllerian duct remnants without risking the vas deferens is recommended. A long follow-up will be needed for assessment of the fertility in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since no harm is derived from the presence of feminine structures, it seems to us that they can be respected. In addition, its removal constantly implies the sacrifice of deferent ducts because they adhere very closely to the uterine walls (4,12). If the testicles can be brought to the scrotum they must be treated as in regular cryptorchidism, and if this is impossible, an orchidectomy must bp erformed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The reason for this is the role of AMH in testicular descent, which it will not fulfill when dysfunctional [12]. Moreover, testicular descent may further be hindered mechanically by the presence of remnant müllerian structures [18]. Infertility is the rule in PMDS [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%