2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent norms and tipping points: The case of female genital cutting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, both and Novak (2020) reject a strict version of social convention theory, where the cutting decision depends only on what others in the community are doing. Rather, they suggest that the private preferences for FGC is important for the decision of whether or not to cut one's daughter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In summary, both and Novak (2020) reject a strict version of social convention theory, where the cutting decision depends only on what others in the community are doing. Rather, they suggest that the private preferences for FGC is important for the decision of whether or not to cut one's daughter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, recent quantitative evidence from selected countries has challenged the explanatory power of social convention theory in the case of FGC (Bellemare et al, 2015;Efferson et al, 2015;Novak, 2020). Efferson et al (2015) find in their Sudanese sample that community level cutting rates vary continuously along the full spectrum, rather than being extremely high or extremely low and displaying a clear discontinuity suggestive of coordination, leading them to state that "Female genital cutting is not a social coordination norm".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, atrocity architects can attempt to shift the diffusion curve upward by increasing actors' intrinsic valuations for atrocity (e.g., by propaganda) and/or by promoting greater network benefits from atrocity. Of course, atrocity preventers want to do the 30 Orians (1969), Mackie (1996), Efferson, et al (2015), Novak (2016), Borker, et al (2017).…”
Section: The Nonstandard Self: the Networked Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we contribute to a growing literature on the importance of social norms in economics, including norms for risk sharing in village economies (Jakiela and Ozier, 2016), productivity in firms (Huck et al, 2012), xenophobia (Bursztyn et al, 2020a), female genital cutting (Efferson et al, 2015;Vogt et al, 2016;Novak, 2020) and female labor force participation (Bursztyn et al, 2020b). On a broader scale, we also contribute to the literature on the role of culture and social norms in health behavior in social sciences and medicine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%