2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2022.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent olfactory dysfunction in mild COVID-19 patients: A descriptive study of the characteristics and association with other symptoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study indicated that most patients who recovered from COVID-19 with persistent hyposmia 4 months after the end of the infection still presented with mild prefrontal function deficits, confirming the hypothesis about a retrograde effect of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on the brain regions contiguous to the entry zone. Recent studies confirmed the long-term persistence of both smell and cognitive dysfunction as brain fog in post-COVID-19 patients (García-Meléndez et al, 2023) The present study indicated that most patients who recovered from COVID-19 with persistent hyposmia 4 months after the end of the infection still presented with mild prefrontal function deficits, confirming the hypothesis about a retrograde effect of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on the brain regions contiguous to the entry zone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The present study indicated that most patients who recovered from COVID-19 with persistent hyposmia 4 months after the end of the infection still presented with mild prefrontal function deficits, confirming the hypothesis about a retrograde effect of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on the brain regions contiguous to the entry zone. Recent studies confirmed the long-term persistence of both smell and cognitive dysfunction as brain fog in post-COVID-19 patients (García-Meléndez et al, 2023) The present study indicated that most patients who recovered from COVID-19 with persistent hyposmia 4 months after the end of the infection still presented with mild prefrontal function deficits, confirming the hypothesis about a retrograde effect of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on the brain regions contiguous to the entry zone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The fact that hyposmia is more prevalent than anosmia in patients with long COVID caught our attention. These findings were also found in the study by [18], which used the Sniffin´ Sticks test to quantify olfactory disorders. The study also found a higher prevalence of hyposmia than anosmia (41.9% and 30.2% respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Our sample was made up of women (90%), which is in line with several studies, where the female sex is considered a risk factor for long COVID [2,18,19]. In the systematic review with meta-analysis conducted by [2], of the 16 articles used to analyze sex as a risk factor for the development of long COVID symptoms, in 14 of them, the female sex was associated with greater risk for long COVID.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Even though this could have been caused by a sample bias in our study, our finding corroborates previous results from Akbari and colleagues 39 who found significant better identification scores in smokers but also previous studies 41,42 which reported that COVID‐19‐related OD is less frequent in patients with a smoking habit. Prevalence of parosmia in our population (80%) was higher when compared to previous studies, although this varies widely across different studies in the literature and reported to be between 43% at 6 months and 70.9% when evaluated at 1 year 43–46 . A higher prevalence of parosmia in our group of patients could be explained either by a longer OD in our population (1.4 years) or by the fact that only patients with a self‐reported long‐term OD were referred to our long‐COVID smell clinic and included in the study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Prevalence of parosmia in our population (80%) was higher when compared to previous studies, although this varies widely across different studies in the literature and reported to be between 43% at 6 months and 70.9% when evaluated at 1 year. [43][44][45][46] A higher prevalence of parosmia in our group of patients could be explained either by a longer OD in our population (1.4 years) or by the fact that only patients with a self-reported long-term OD were referred to our long-COVID smell clinic and included in the study. Although past studies have reported a possible influence of parosmia 14,15 and phantosmia 10 on smell recovery our analysis did not confirm that.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%