2022
DOI: 10.1071/ah21353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent opioid use after hospital discharge in Australia: a systematic review

Abstract: Objective This systematic review identified studies that provided an estimate of persistent opioid use following patient discharge from hospital settings in Australia. Methods A literature search was performed on 5 December 2020, with no date restrictions to identify studies that reported a rate of persistent opioid use following patient discharge from Australian Hospitals. The search strategy combined all terms relating to the themes ‘hospital patients’, ‘prescribing’, ‘opioids’ and ‘Australia’. Studi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the magnitude of the discharge opioid effect was smaller than for some of these other covariates already established to be −.5 .5 1.5 2.5 3.5 −.5 .5 1.5 2.5 3.5 −.5 .5 1.5 2.5 3.5 −.5 .5 1.5 2. To our knowledge, this is the largest Australian persistent postoperative opioid use study [5], and the first international study that has specifically examined the impact of tapentadol on persistent postoperative opioid use [6]. We were unable to identify the specific surgical specialty for all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that the magnitude of the discharge opioid effect was smaller than for some of these other covariates already established to be −.5 .5 1.5 2.5 3.5 −.5 .5 1.5 2.5 3.5 −.5 .5 1.5 2.5 3.5 −.5 .5 1.5 2. To our knowledge, this is the largest Australian persistent postoperative opioid use study [5], and the first international study that has specifically examined the impact of tapentadol on persistent postoperative opioid use [6]. We were unable to identify the specific surgical specialty for all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This study is one of the largest and most extensive studies of persistent opioid use following surgery, strengthened by almost complete linkage to patients' 12‐month medication history and 6 months of follow‐up data. To our knowledge, this is the largest Australian persistent postoperative opioid use study [5], and the first international study that has specifically examined the impact of tapentadol on persistent postoperative opioid use [6]. The use of multiple sites in this study, with patients from four large hospitals across three states of Australia, increases generalisability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 Opioid prescribing requires careful planning due to potentially serious adverse outcomes, including dependence and overdose. [5][6][7][8] To reduce this risk, opioids should be used at the lowest effective dose for the shortest appropriate duration. However, Australian studies show 3.9-10.5% of opioid-na€ ıve patients discharged with opioids after surgery developed persistent use, 8 while 36.5% of ED patients discharged with opioids for low back pain were still taking opioids four weeks after ED presentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data also highlighted higher proportions prescribed tapentadol compared with oxycodone in those patients receiving cardiac valve interventions and coronary bypass (21.3% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001) and spinal surgery (5.3% vs. 4.6%, p < 0.001). As demonstrated in a 2022 systematic review, rates of persistent opioid use after surgery in Australia vary widely from 5.3% after joint arthroplasty to 50.1% after spinal surgery [5]. In the study by Lam et al., surgical specialties were not reliably captured due to inconsistent or non‐specific data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%