2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent Pandemics

Abstract: We ask whether mortality from historical pandemics has any predictive content for mortality in the Covid-19 pandemic. We find strong persistence in public health performance. Places that performed worse in terms of mortality in the 1918 influenza pandemic also have higher Covid-19 mortality today. This is true across countries as well as across a sample of large US cities. Experience with SARS in 2003 is associated with slightly lower mortality today. We discuss some socio-political factors that may account fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the outbreak of a pandemic was predicted to be an event that was only a matter of time, the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in 2019, especially the speed at which it reached the pandemic status, came as a big surprise and laid bare the level of unpreparedness for this type of situation [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. While the earlier emergence of respiratory viruses—coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV) in 2002 (first reported in the Guangdong province in southern China), which infected 8098 people in nearly 30 countries and killed 774 of them [ 4 , 5 ], and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012 (first identified in Saudi Arabia), causing 850 cases in over 20 countries [ 6 ]—can be read as a harbinger of events to come, this does not alter the fact that determining the precise timing and location of the coronavirus outbreak that led to the current pandemic remains a virtually impossible task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the outbreak of a pandemic was predicted to be an event that was only a matter of time, the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in 2019, especially the speed at which it reached the pandemic status, came as a big surprise and laid bare the level of unpreparedness for this type of situation [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. While the earlier emergence of respiratory viruses—coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV) in 2002 (first reported in the Guangdong province in southern China), which infected 8098 people in nearly 30 countries and killed 774 of them [ 4 , 5 ], and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012 (first identified in Saudi Arabia), causing 850 cases in over 20 countries [ 6 ]—can be read as a harbinger of events to come, this does not alter the fact that determining the precise timing and location of the coronavirus outbreak that led to the current pandemic remains a virtually impossible task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many have looked to the 1918 influenza pandemic for insight into the ongoing epidemiological and economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic (Beach et al 2020; Peter Z Lin and Meissner 2021), fewer have explored a far more recent public health crisis with a similarly global footprint. In September 1968, the US was confronted with a novel H3N2 influenza virus that originated in China and was dubbed the ‘Hong Kong Flu’ or ‘Mao Flu’ 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%