2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13753-019-00228-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent Precarity and the Disaster of Everyday Life: Homeless People’s Experiences of Natural and Other Hazards

Abstract: Knowledge of how homeless people deal with natural hazards and disasters is sparse and there is a remarkable absence of homeless people in policies and practices for disaster risk reduction (DRR). This article aims at filling this gap by exploring the lives of homeless people in two New Zealand cities that are exposed to natural hazards. It shows that natural hazards are of marginal concern to homeless people in comparison to the everyday hazards that they experience and that make their everyday life a disaste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, they are constantly reproduced and/or gradually altered through individual practices. Such approaches can be used not just to systematically scrutinize how the respective societal context produces specific patterns of vulnerability with respect to flood events (De Marchi & Scolobig, 2012;Kuhlicke, 2015;Kuhlicke, Scolobig, et al, 2011a), but also how everyday precarious living conditions influence people's capacity to cope with and adapt to flood events (Gaillard, Walters, Rickerby, & Shi, 2019).…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, they are constantly reproduced and/or gradually altered through individual practices. Such approaches can be used not just to systematically scrutinize how the respective societal context produces specific patterns of vulnerability with respect to flood events (De Marchi & Scolobig, 2012;Kuhlicke, 2015;Kuhlicke, Scolobig, et al, 2011a), but also how everyday precarious living conditions influence people's capacity to cope with and adapt to flood events (Gaillard, Walters, Rickerby, & Shi, 2019).…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, and even more challenging, some groups of people are simply excluded from research and policy discourse such as the homeless, migrants, prisoners, and people in mobile homes (Gaillard, Walters, Rickerby, & Shi, 2019) or people who transgress hetero-normal norms (Wisner, Berger, & Gaillard, 2016). Accuracy may suffer as well as moral authority be eroded by studies that do not systematically ask for consent from research participants (if not for their active participation and co-production of knowledge), especially for more vulnerable groups (such as undocumented migrants, homeless, etc.…”
Section: Where Do We Stand: Bridging the Knowledge-action Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power is both a force for action and resistance and affects how we perceive the world; it is pervasive [33][34][35]. It is necessary to unpack power to discern how vulnerability unfolds in natural hazard and disaster settings [36]. We were interested in how people made sense of their experiences of their lives in the context of the Kaikōura earthquake.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%