2022
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12111909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent Sleep Quality Deterioration among Post-COVID-19 Patients: Results from a 6-Month Follow-Up Study

Abstract: Background: To date, evidence about sleep disturbances among post-COVID-19 patients is limited. This study aimed to evaluate sleep quality after hospitalization due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: In-person follow-up was conducted in patients with prior hospitalization due to COVID-19 1(Τ1), 3(Τ2), and 6 (Τ3) months after hospital discharge. Patients were asked to complete questionnaires concerning sleep quality: the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Athens Insomn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Poor sleep quality was common (> 60%) among long COVID patients in our study, that finding is consistent with other recent studies (Kalamara et al 2022 ; Merikanto et al 2023 ). Multiple factors could have a role in pathogenesis of sleep disturbances in long COVID (Crook et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Poor sleep quality was common (> 60%) among long COVID patients in our study, that finding is consistent with other recent studies (Kalamara et al 2022 ; Merikanto et al 2023 ). Multiple factors could have a role in pathogenesis of sleep disturbances in long COVID (Crook et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Depression and anxiety levels increase in the elderly in the early period after COVID-19 (Mowla et al, 2022). However, mood and sleep symptoms regress within a few months after recovery (Chevinsky et al, 2021; Kalamara et al, 2022), In our study, depression and sleep quality were similar to the controls in all follow-ups of the patients. The absence of difference at 12 months was an expected finding, but the lack of difference in our early follow-up may be related to the inclusion of patients in the study after full recovery of their COVID-19 respiratory symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Perhaps, if the questionnaire is applied at later, where the virus has been eradicated or different conditions exist, the results may vary, which should be verified with more studies. Despite this, (Kalamara et al, 2022) a 6-month longitudinal study was done and it was verified that time had no effect on the ESS scale. This is reliable with what was earlier presented, since data prior to COVID-19 had a similar trend to the one we found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%