2023
DOI: 10.1038/s43588-022-00394-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent spectral theory-guided protein engineering

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alphafold2 is currently the most popular tool for protein folding, which combines knowledge of protein structure with deep learning . While Alphafold2 has achieved significant success in protein folding prediction, its predictive accuracy is lower compared to experimental techniques such as X-ray crystallography . Additionally, running Alphafold2 requires substantial computational resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alphafold2 is currently the most popular tool for protein folding, which combines knowledge of protein structure with deep learning . While Alphafold2 has achieved significant success in protein folding prediction, its predictive accuracy is lower compared to experimental techniques such as X-ray crystallography . Additionally, running Alphafold2 requires substantial computational resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…581 While Alphafold2 has achieved significant success in protein folding prediction, its predictive accuracy is lower compared to experimental techniques such as X-ray crystallography. 582 Additionally, running Alphafold2 requires substantial computational resources. Other advanced methods such as DeepSVM fold have also been proposed, which achieved a prediction accuracy of 67.3% and outperformed other methods.…”
Section: Protein Folding Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally agreed that for many proteins, sequence determines structure, and structure strongly influences function. Thus, there have been efforts to enrich protein representations by incorporating structural information using voxels, contact maps, or graph neural networks. However, these have not led to significant performance improvements, likely because variant structures vary in subtle yet impactful ways which are challenging to model and extremely difficult to observe experimentally, despite an explosion in protein structure prediction tools. Many available protein structures may be quite noisy or inaccurate.…”
Section: Navigating Protein Fitness Landscapes Using Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resource-intensive nature hinders model revisions from a few labeled data, and the latter learning requirement conditions effective model training on substantial volumes of high-quality protein data. Alternatively, topology- or geometry-based models encode protein structures for effective local environment representation. ,, These models are less data-intensive and can potentially capture crucial characteristics for topology-aware protein properties, such as binding affinity and thermostability. To this end, ProtLGN employed roto-translation equivariant graph convolutions that efficiently analyze the microenvironment of AAs at the structure level, considering the physicochemical properties of its spatially closed AA neighbors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%