Person perception effects of computer-simulated male and female head movement

Abstract

Sixteen male and sixteen female student observers were shown computer-simulated sequences of male and female head movement based on time-series protocols of real-life interactions and were asked to rate their impressions of the computer actors on the screen. While in one experimental condition the sex of the movement origin matched the sex of the computer model, the movement protocols were exchanged in the second condition. Impression formation effects were analyzed in a three-factorial ANOVA design, with the independent factors (1) sex of observer, (2) sex of computer model, and (3) sex of movement origin. The results point to strong main effects of the sex of movement origin. Male behavior was perceived as more active and mobile, whether displayed by a male or female computer model. However, three-way interactions indicate that male and female head movement was evaluated differently by male and female observers depending on the sex of the computer model. Counterintuitively, female computer models scored higher in male observers' judgments of "friendliness" and "attractiveness" when displaying male head movement.In an early review of the literature, EIIsworth and Ludwig (1972) stated that "in research on nonverbal behavior sex differences are the rule rather than the exception" (p. 379). Despite the empirical evidence for sex differences in nonverbal decoding abilities as well as in many aspects of nonverbal behavior (see Hall, 1978Hall, , 1984, the authors pointed to specific measurement and design problems, which have long restricted nonverbal research to mainly descriptive issues (EIIsworth & Ludwig, 1972). One problem has been the predominant use of aggregate data, which made it difficult to isolate relevant cues from the continuous stream of behavior and to relate these cues to particular social effects or interpersonal meaning. With the technological and methodological developments of the last two decades, however, this problem has been largely solved. Video-based,

Physiological evidence for a dual process model of the social effects of emotion in computers

“…Regarding HR deceleration, we looked at the trend from 0 to 6 s. Regarding behavioral measures, we looked at cooperation rate, i.e., the number of times participants cooperated over all rounds. Regarding subjective measures, we included the person perception scale (Bente et al, 1994), which consists of pairs of words that measure people's impressions of the agents -for example, likable-dislikable, kindcruel, and friendly-unfriendly.…”

A Social Cognition Perspective on Human–Computer Trust: The Effect of Perceived Warmth and Competence on Trust in Decision-Making With Computers

“…To infer warmth and competence attributions from social perception, we compiled a 5-point semantic differential containing 25 adjective pairs designed to assess a broad range of interpersonal attributes (Bente et al, 1996;von der Pütten et al, 2010). Behavioral trust was measured using the number of tokens participants are willing to exchange in the give-some dilemma (1 − 5).…”

The others: Universals and cultural specificities in the perception of status and dominance from nonverbal behavior

“…skin color, facial features, clothing) and thus are likely to activate particular stereotypes (see Bargh, Chen, & Burrows, 1996;Chen & Bargh, 1997) which could contaminate the effects of nonverbal cues. To escape from this dilemma we have suggested to employ computer-animations of neutral artificial characters instead of videos (Bente, 1989;Bente, Feist, & Elder, 1996). As revealed through earlier studies, character animations are able to accurately reproduce video recorded nonverbal behavior in its spatial details and subtle dynamics (Bente, Krämer, & Petersen, 2002; and to induce social impressions comparable to the original video sequences they are based on .…”