Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2016 2016
DOI: 10.5244/c.30.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Person Re-identification in Appearance Impaired Scenarios

Abstract: Person re-identification is critical in surveillance applications. Current approaches rely on appearance based features extracted from a single or multiple shots of the target and candidate matches. These approaches are at a disadvantage when trying to distinguish between candidates dressed in similar colors or when targets change their clothing. In this paper we propose a dynamics-based feature to overcome this limitation. The main idea is to capture soft biometrics from gait and motion patterns by gathering … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of existing methods in person ReID focus on either feature extraction [44,28,23,8,40], or similarity measurement [17,27,22,39]. Person image descriptors commonly used include color histogram [14,17,38], local binary patterns [14], Gabor features [17], and etc., which show certain robustness to the variations of poses, illumination and viewpoints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of existing methods in person ReID focus on either feature extraction [44,28,23,8,40], or similarity measurement [17,27,22,39]. Person image descriptors commonly used include color histogram [14,17,38], local binary patterns [14], Gabor features [17], and etc., which show certain robustness to the variations of poses, illumination and viewpoints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical approaches focus on obtaining view-invariant appearance features [11], and/or learning matching models specific to a given pair of camera views to be matched [20]. Relatively less studied directions include enhancing re-identification using soft-biometrics like attributes [18], height [25,1], shape [1,15], or movement style [14]. Such techniques are likely to be increasingly important when addressing realistic longer-duration home/office data where identity should be estimated correctly despite that people are likely to change clothes.…”
Section: Underpinning Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, tracking benchmarks are typically defined as relatively shortterm problems, where there is limited change in a person's appearance, or long periods without an observation from any camera. In contrast to the practical case where, particularly in smart homes/offices, people may change clothes [14] or spend time out of views of all cameras while in rooms where privacy is expected. Existing work in multitarget multi-camera tracking exploits within-camera tracking, and multi-camera optimisation to find globally coherent estimate of person identities across space and time [26,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this assumption does not hold, (see Figure 3.1), up to second order moment information is not sufficient to completely represent relatively complex local regions. Though Fisher Vector encoding feature can mimic a non-Gaussian distribution with GMM and achieve decent results on re-id [40,41], it assumes that the variables at the pixel-level feature are independent from each other. Moreover, the GMM needs a training set to learn its parameters.…”
Section: Mom: Mean Of Moments Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing re-id literature focuses on two aspects of the problem: 1) designing viewpoint invariant feature descriptors [37,40,38,42,39,72,41,10,73,74] and/or 2) learning a supervised classifier to alleviate the effect of the variances across the cameras [75,42,36,76,77,48,78,79,80,81]. Recently, deep neural networks have been adopted to learn both the descriptor and classifier simultaneously [63,82,61,64].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%