2022
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PersonaDrive: a method for the identification and prioritization of personalized cancer drivers

Abstract: Motivation A major challenge in cancer genomics is to distinguish the driver mutations that are causally linked to cancer from passenger mutations that do not contribute to cancer development. The majority of existing methods provide a single driver gene list for the entire cohort of patients. However, since mutation profiles of patients from the same cancer type show a high degree of heterogeneity, a more ideal approach is to identify patient-specific drivers. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we defined personalized drivers predicted by PDRWH as the top-n ranked genes, where n was assigned as twice the median of number of mutated genes in the general driver set across the population of patients [ 21 ]: 8 for breast cancer (BRCA), 10 for kidney clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), 12 for liver cancer (LIHC), 8 for glioblastoma (GBM), and 16 for stomach cancer (STAD). We used the modified REA strategy proposed by PersonaDrive [ 21 ] for a comparison of PDRWH with six personalized prediction methods (DawnRank, Prodigy, SCS, PersonaDrive, Degree and Frequency) across five cancer types from TCGA. For each sample, the identified cancer drivers in the general driver list were adopted to compute the Precision, Recall, and F1-score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, we defined personalized drivers predicted by PDRWH as the top-n ranked genes, where n was assigned as twice the median of number of mutated genes in the general driver set across the population of patients [ 21 ]: 8 for breast cancer (BRCA), 10 for kidney clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), 12 for liver cancer (LIHC), 8 for glioblastoma (GBM), and 16 for stomach cancer (STAD). We used the modified REA strategy proposed by PersonaDrive [ 21 ] for a comparison of PDRWH with six personalized prediction methods (DawnRank, Prodigy, SCS, PersonaDrive, Degree and Frequency) across five cancer types from TCGA. For each sample, the identified cancer drivers in the general driver list were adopted to compute the Precision, Recall, and F1-score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, they are overly dependent on the data quality of individual samples, with poor tolerance for noise and low reliability of the results. To address this issue, PersonaDrive aims to utilize the comprehensive whole cohort data for guiding the personalized driver prediction [ 21 ]. This is achieved by constructing a bipartite graph to model pair-wise relationships among the set of mutated genes and the differently expressed genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although unique in its use of sCCA, our approach is not the only method that aims to identify disease related gene sets. Several other methods have been devised to for this purpose including, but not limited to, DriverNet [59], DawnRank [60], Prodigy [61], PersonaDrive [62], especially for different oncological applications. However, our approach has several important distinctions from these methods.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, PRODIGY [ 20 ] adopts Steiner tree model to evaluate the impact of the genes with mutations on the deregulated pathways to identify personalized cancer driver genes. Later, PersonaDrive [ 21 ] tries to construct a personalized bipartite graph that links mutated genes to differentially expressed genes for each patient, and calculates the edge weights of the graph based on the overlap between the mutated gene and the differentially expressed gene pair in biological pathways. Subsequently, it ranks the the potential driver genes based on their influence scores evaluated by the edge weights in the bipartite graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%