2020
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2020.1779778
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal and social resources in coping with long hours of the Chinese work condition: the dual roles of detachment and social motivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Personal, physical and psychological resources are internal resources that can be possessed and mobilized by the self (e.g., psychological resilience, self-efficacy, sense of control over one's life, and optimism) ( 26 ). Social resources refer to external resources that are embedded within the physical environment and interpersonal interactions ( 27 ). This theory emphasizes that accelerated loss of resources, particularly those that are most valued by the individual, can lead to traumatic stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal, physical and psychological resources are internal resources that can be possessed and mobilized by the self (e.g., psychological resilience, self-efficacy, sense of control over one's life, and optimism) ( 26 ). Social resources refer to external resources that are embedded within the physical environment and interpersonal interactions ( 27 ). This theory emphasizes that accelerated loss of resources, particularly those that are most valued by the individual, can lead to traumatic stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, within the overwork context in Taiwan (Lu et al , 2020), we found that psychological detachment served as a moderator, weakening the negative relationship between job burnout and recovery self-efficacy. Prior research on recovery have provided evidence that psychological detachment mediates the relationship between job stressors and work outcomes (Sonnentag and Fritz, 2015; Lu et al , 2020). However, there is evidence identifying psychological detachment as a moderator on the relations between work stressors and well-being (e.g., Rivkin et al , 2015; Lu and Chou, 2020; Kilroy et al , 2020), implying that individuals can restore their energy and obtain resources by leaving work at work (Steed et al , 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Finally, within the overwork context in Taiwan (Lu et al , 2020), we found that psychological detachment served as a moderator, weakening the negative relationship between job burnout and recovery self-efficacy. Prior research on recovery have provided evidence that psychological detachment mediates the relationship between job stressors and work outcomes (Sonnentag and Fritz, 2015; Lu et al , 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Cross-cultural differences and national values play a crucial role in the occurrence of presenteeism (Cooper and Lu, 2016). Among cross-cultural dimensions, the value given to the job well done (e.g., Protestant work ethic), or the shared value of hard work, long hours (Lu et al, 2020), and endurance (Confucian culture), or the perceived legitimacy of absenteeism across cultures (Addae et al, 2013), among others, may play a determinant role in explaining the decision of working during illness. Cross-cultural issues are therefore considered in our health equation.…”
Section: The Cross-cultural Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%