1968
DOI: 10.1136/jech.22.3.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal factors as a cause of differences in prescribing by general practitioners.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lynn (1971) found that a physician's attitude about the legitimacy of prescribed drug usage in a variety of settings is more strongly related to the social values and moral standards of the physician than to his medical or scientific background. The physician who is better educated, holds progressive views, considers the patient a whole entity (Joyce, Lost, & Weatherall, 1967), is not authoritarian (Klerman, Sharaf, Holzman, & Levinson, 1969), and finds the patient easy to talk to if not more likeable (Cartwright, 1974) tends not to prescribe mood-modifying drugs. If, on the other hand, the physician is pessimistic about the outcome of treatment or feels anger toward the patient (Shader, Binstock, & Scott, 1968), then mood-modifying drugs are more likely to be prescribed, Brodsky (1 970) reported that physicians also prescribe moodmodifying drugs to housewives in the belief that they can always sleep and need not be mentally alert to perform the job.…”
Section: Physician Behavior and Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lynn (1971) found that a physician's attitude about the legitimacy of prescribed drug usage in a variety of settings is more strongly related to the social values and moral standards of the physician than to his medical or scientific background. The physician who is better educated, holds progressive views, considers the patient a whole entity (Joyce, Lost, & Weatherall, 1967), is not authoritarian (Klerman, Sharaf, Holzman, & Levinson, 1969), and finds the patient easy to talk to if not more likeable (Cartwright, 1974) tends not to prescribe mood-modifying drugs. If, on the other hand, the physician is pessimistic about the outcome of treatment or feels anger toward the patient (Shader, Binstock, & Scott, 1968), then mood-modifying drugs are more likely to be prescribed, Brodsky (1 970) reported that physicians also prescribe moodmodifying drugs to housewives in the belief that they can always sleep and need not be mentally alert to perform the job.…”
Section: Physician Behavior and Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A British study showed that doctors qualified overseas were more likely to perceive patients' expectation to prescribe (8) whereas another showed no difference in the volume and cost of drugs prescribed by Asian or British trained physicians (9). Moreover, physicians' postgraduate qualifications or training are associated with lower prescribing rates (8, 10, 11). In a study of British general practitioners, practices providing vocational training prescribed fewer broad‐spectrum antibiotics than the practices not associated with training (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is suspected that all therapeutic interven tions are merely patient oriented. As mentioned by Joyce et al [4] and Hemminki [6], there seems to be an idiosyn cratic element to doctors' prescription habits. Moreover, although side effects are frequently associated with pa tients' non-compliance, there is no evidence for such a prominent role of adverse reactions [7,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the possibility of proceed ing in accordance with their own impressions. Although there are quite a few reports on medical prescription pat terns [1][2][3][4], the titration of investigational drugs when compared to placebo as well as concomitant treatment has been widely neglected. Based on experiences in 9 clin ical trials with psychotropic drugs, this paper tries to elu cidate these 'artistic interventions' in order to stimulate some discussion on widely established customs in the design of clinical trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%