2014
DOI: 10.15405/ejsbs.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal Features and Research Potential of Students

Abstract: This article describes methods and results of study of personal features and research potential of Russian students. We revealed differences in these characteristics in 245 students of different years and fields of education. We found out differences in levels of research potential development between bachelor students, master students and specialist students of humanities and natural sciences. We defined and describe those personal features which promote active students' involvement in research and hence-rese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify the accuracy of supervisors' evaluations, we used techniques package that was offered to 2nd year masters and their supervisors. As the objectively measured research abilities of students we used selected indicators: students' research potential and its components were studied with The Research Potential Inventory, developed in St.-Petersburg State University (Bordovskaia, 2013;Bordovskaia & Kostromina, 2013); students' cognitive abilities were studied with The Armthauer Intelligence Structure Test, IST, an adapted form, and The Reflexivity of thinking questionnaire by Karpov (2003). Masters also completed a questionnaire taking into account a number of their publications, participation in conferences and research projects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To identify the accuracy of supervisors' evaluations, we used techniques package that was offered to 2nd year masters and their supervisors. As the objectively measured research abilities of students we used selected indicators: students' research potential and its components were studied with The Research Potential Inventory, developed in St.-Petersburg State University (Bordovskaia, 2013;Bordovskaia & Kostromina, 2013); students' cognitive abilities were studied with The Armthauer Intelligence Structure Test, IST, an adapted form, and The Reflexivity of thinking questionnaire by Karpov (2003). Masters also completed a questionnaire taking into account a number of their publications, participation in conferences and research projects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High level of research potential of students is positively correlated with extraversion, self-control, emotional stability, expressiveness, as well as the personality orientation to the future (Bordovskaia & Kostromina, 2013). Maturity of goal-setting processes, forecasting, self-reflection largely determines the promptness of completion of different kinds of students` work (Kostromina, 2013), and its incorrect assessment by supervisors could lead to unexpected students` procrastination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pérez & Rodríguez del Bosque (2013) study the personal characteristics of consumers regarding the perception of corporate social responsibility; Grygus & Prusik (2015) analyse the personal characteristics of health professionals, and Bordovskaia & Kostromina (2013) researched the personal characteristics of students. Each of the studies involved seeks to find common characteristics to understand the behaviour of these individuals.…”
Section: Personal Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approach emphasizes the uniqueness of subjects' life-worlds and their semantic cohesion at different levels of the public organization (Bordovskaia & Kostromina, 2014). The process of a modern technological project development requires communicative environment analyzing and subject interactions planning in addition to the feasibility study, research of demand for the provided services, resources and other objective conditions.…”
Section: Features Of Sociotechnical Interactions Design In Network Inmentioning
confidence: 99%