Personal networks and knowledge transfer in inter‐organizational networks

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to test the transfer of good practices under the effect of various aspects of personal networks. Whereas, the majority of former work considers a direct effect of networks on knowledge transfer, the authors examined two intermediate mechanisms: the access to strategic resources and the individual's absorptive capacity.Design/methodology/approachA quantitative study was used to collect data, via a face‐to‐face questionnaire with key individuals in small and medium entreprises members of consortia in Tunisia. Data were analysed with a structural equations approach, based on partial least squared‐path modelling techniques.FindingsResults emphasize the impact of network size, strength of ties and absorptive capacity on the strategic resource access and the impact of indirect ties, strength and range of ties on the absorptive capacity. Moreover, while absorptive capacity positively impacts good practice transfer, no support was found to the effect of resource access.Research limitations/implicationsThe main limitation of this study concerns the measuring of good practice transfer, since in literature there are often imprecise proxies. Also, while the authors have investigated the global impact of strategic resources, future research needs to treat them separately. Finally, a longitudinal study allows better capture of the evolution of the phenomenon studied.Practical implicationsTop management and directors at a consortium level need to pay careful attention to the social context within which knowledge transfer efforts occur. Resources exchanged and the absorptive capacity developed through social interactions must be designed to increase knowledge flows between firms.Originality/valueThe paper links two bodies of research often studied separately in inter‐organizational research: literature on social networks and that on inter‐organizational learning. It is hoped that the paper contributes to a cross‐fertilization of the two fields.

The internal mechanisms of entrepreneurs’ social capital: A multi-network analysis

“…By belonging to diverse social groups and relationship networks, individual entrepreneurs can use and exploit both personal as well as professional networks. In their dual role as both business owners and managers, in other words, given the lack of agency problems or separation between ownership and control, small-scale local entrepreneurs benefit from placing each and every one of their personal and professional relationship networks at their firms’ disposal (Gedajlovic and Carney, 2010; Hernández-Carrión et al, 2017; Stam et al, 2014), which is not necessarily true in the case of board members who are not involved in their firms’ ownership structures (Acquaah, 2007; Burt, 2004; Gedajlovic and Carney, 2010; Rejeb-Khachlouf et al, 2011).…”

Taking it personally: How to increase interorganizational knowledge sharing in a tourist district

“…Structural factors can be defined as those associated with the nature of the knowledge itself and of the industry (Lin et al., 2012; Tinsley and Lynch, 2001; Wang and Noe, 2010), while contextual factors derive from the nature of the region, culture, and network within which the sharing occurs (Chen and Cheng, 2012; Seba et al., 2012). Personal factors are those associated with individual physical and psychological characteristics that affect the decision to share knowledge (Al-Busaidi, 2014; Cho et al., 2007; Huang et al., 2008; Rejeb-Khachlouf et al., 2011). Focusing on personal factors, Nooshinfard and Nemati-Anaraki (2014) reviewed previous literature and identified trust, perception, attitude, communication and cooperation, and motivation as personal factors that affect knowledge sharing.…”

Relação Entre Orientação Para Objetivos, Partilha Do Conhecimento E Capacidade Absortiva Em Equipas Ágeis

“…O relacionamento entre a partilha do conhecimento e a capacidade absortiva comprovadamente existe, mas a literatura não é clara sobre como isso acontece. Alguns estudos apontam que a partilha influencia a capacidade absortiva (Daghfous & Ahmad, 2015;Wuryaningrat, 2013), enquanto outros indicam a direção contrária (Awang, Hussain & Malek, 2013;Paulsen & Hjertø, 2014;Rejeb-Khachlouf, Mezghani & Quélin, 2011). Diversos fatores influenciam a partilha do conhecimento e a capacidade absortiva, dentre eles está a orientação para objetivos, um preditor de comportamento (Dweck, 1986) que explica as motivações como dois objetivos principais em situações ligadas a realizações de tarefas: objetivos de aprendizagem ou de desempenho (Dweck, 1986).…”