2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure measurements in Swiss adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
64
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
64
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Exposure from cordless phone base stations, WLAN access points and other people's mobile phones were estimated by linear regression models calibrated on the personal measurement data available from 95 study participants (Roser et al 2016c). …”
Section: Rf-emf Dose Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure from cordless phone base stations, WLAN access points and other people's mobile phones were estimated by linear regression models calibrated on the personal measurement data available from 95 study participants (Roser et al 2016c). …”
Section: Rf-emf Dose Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ExpoM‐RF can sample 16 different frequency bands in the range of FM radio (87.5–108 MHz) to ISM 5.8 GHz/U‐NII 1‐2e (5,150–5,875 MHz), allowing a detailed specification of the exposure from all major wireless communication and broadcasting services (see Appendix 1, Table S1 for details). ExpoM‐RF devices were previously used in the Swiss HERMES study [Roser et al, ] and were calibrated in an anechoic chamber every 6 months throughout the measurement campaign. During calibration, a 16‐point calibration of known electromagnetic field levels between 0.016 mV/m and 5V/m was performed for each frequency band, averaging the response across three repeated measurements in different orientations to account for the isotropy of the device.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the measurement files were imported from the ExpoM‐RF and merged with the time‐activity information, they were corrected for discrepancies in the diary entries based on GPS information recorded by the ExpoM‐RF. This process is described in more detail elsewhere [Roser et al, ]. Furthermore, two basic corrections were performed: Very low and very high signal strengths are not well‐quantifiable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations