2014
DOI: 10.4158/ep14017.or
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients 65 Years and Older

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, we showed that patients who used CGMS (N = 4) had better glycaemic control, compared with those who did not, which was consistent with prior data from observational and randomized trial in patients aged >60 (65) years [15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Of note, we showed that patients who used CGMS (N = 4) had better glycaemic control, compared with those who did not, which was consistent with prior data from observational and randomized trial in patients aged >60 (65) years [15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The potential value of RT-CGM in older adults is becoming more widely recognized, 10 especially given the growing understanding that reduced hypoglycemic awareness is a major contributor to the problems of severe hypoglycemia in this patient population. 6 Indeed, from the RT-CGM current users group, we informally surveyed a small number of their physicians (n = 26) and found that the vast majority agreed that RT-CGM had helped their patient to achieve better control of their diabetes (96.2%) and had led to an improvement in their patient’s QOL (100%), while all agreed that Medicare should provide RT-CGM coverage in “appropriately needy patients over 65.” Future studies will need to document these observations in a more prospective manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 Indeed, among seniors with diabetes, recent studies have documented that hospitalizations for hypoglycemia exceed those for hyperglycemia and are linked to elevated mortality risk. 9 Early evidence suggests that RT-CGM use in this population may reduce the frequency of severe hypoglycemic episodes and improve overall glycemic control, 10 but—quite unfortunately—when many patients with T1D switch to Medicare at age 65, RT-CGM is no longer a covered benefit. This means that those individuals at the highest risk for hypoglycemia lose the security of having a device that can alert them to incipient and/or actual hypoglycemia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, CGM users were shown to have a reduction in severe hypoglycemic episodes from 52 (recorded in the five years before CGM initiation) to 12 after starting CGM. Overall, the proportion of patients with any severe hypoglycemia fell from 79% to 31% after initiation of CGM (7). However, we are conscious of the major limitations of these studies which are non-randomized, unblinded, and without any specific treatment protocols involving glucose-lowering drugs.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%