2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42001-019-00044-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal stories matter: topic evolution and popularity among pro- and anti-vaccine online articles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Frequently discussed anti-vaccine topics included child deaths, flu shot, doctors’ testimonials, and so on. Some topics are more likely to engage viewers than others (Xu, 2019). For instance, the topic of personal story receives much more reactions, shares, and comments than other pro-vaccine topics.…”
Section: Readability Engagement and Cognitive Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frequently discussed anti-vaccine topics included child deaths, flu shot, doctors’ testimonials, and so on. Some topics are more likely to engage viewers than others (Xu, 2019). For instance, the topic of personal story receives much more reactions, shares, and comments than other pro-vaccine topics.…”
Section: Readability Engagement and Cognitive Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not only do health researchers and practitioners focus on increasing the engagement level of health information anti-vaccine information creators also aim to make their messages more engaging. Anti-vaccine articles are found to be more engaging on social media than pro-vaccine articles (Xu, 2019; Xu & Guo, 2018). Previous studies mainly focus on the impact of emotional narratives on the engagingness of anti-vaccine articles (Betsch, Ulshofer, Renkewitz, & Betsch, 2011; Kata, 2010, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Episodic frames often present individuals' experiences, narratives, and stories related to an issue. Those frames often depend on sensationalism to arouse emotional responses among audiences and tend to attract more attention (Xu, 2019); and are regarded as low-quality coverage, which in the end reduced audiences' risk judgments (Dudo et al, 2007). In contrast, thematic frames provide background information as well as discuss things that people can do to solve problems and how various societal and structural factors contribute to the issue (De Vreese et al, 2001;Iyengar, 1991).…”
Section: Agenda Setting Framing and Behavior Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More seriously, the main argumentative strategies of anti-vaccine activists on the Internet have been the object of a number of studies 13,31,32 . Without any pretension of an exhaustive review, the main kinds of arguments can be grouped into a few clusters: (i) Dangerous ingredients: much heat was generated by the presence of ethylmercury as a preservative in vaccines, leading to its exclusion from most vaccines used in the United States 33 .…”
Section: "Well I Read It On the Internet"mentioning
confidence: 99%