2005
DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.20.2516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal Use of Hair Dyes and Risk of Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
91
2
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
6
91
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Hair dye use has been associated with an increased risk of various cancers in some studies, but these results have generally not been confirmed (14). The present study is the first to assess hair relaxers in relation to a cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Hair dye use has been associated with an increased risk of various cancers in some studies, but these results have generally not been confirmed (14). The present study is the first to assess hair relaxers in relation to a cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…35,148,[438][439][440][441][442][443][444][445][446][447] In a recent meta-analysis of 14 studies, Takkouche et al 450 reported a significant excess risk of NHL among ever-users of hair dyes, compared to never-users (meta-RR 5 1.23, 95% CI: 1.07-1.42). There was heterogeneity of results by study design, as the relative risk estimates observed in the casecontrol studies were significantly elevated (meta-RR 5 1.27, 95% CI: 1.06-1.53), but those in the 2 cohort studies were not (meta-RR 5 1.10, 95% CI: 0.94-1.28).…”
Section: Hair Dyesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a population-based case-control study of men and women, permanent hair dye use, particularly use of dark hair coloring products, was associated with increased risk for multiple myeloma, based on a small number of exposed cases (n 5 12 permanent users among men and women; n 5 6 permanent brown/brunette users among women). 225 A recent meta-analysis 228 reported an inverse association among cohort studies (meta-RR 5 0.69, 95% CI: 0.28-1.66), while a weak positive association was observed for case-control studies (meta-RR 5 1.31, 95% CI: 1.03-1.67). The inconsistency within and among study findings may be a reflection of differences in exposure recall and in exposure misclassification, as hair color chemical formulations and patterns of hair dye use-including color and product type-have varied over time.…”
Section: Cosmetologists Hairdressers and Hair Coloring Product Exposmentioning
confidence: 99%