2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalised Normative Feedback for Preventing Alcohol Misuse in University Students: Solomon Three-Group Randomised Controlled Trial

Abstract: BackgroundYoung people tend to over-estimate peer group drinking levels. Personalised normative feedback (PNF) aims to correct this misperception by providing information about personal drinking levels and patterns compared with norms in similar aged peer groups. PNF is intended to raise motivation for behaviour change and has been highlighted for alcohol misuse prevention by the British Government Behavioural Insight Team. The objective of the trial was to assess the effectiveness of PNF with college students… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with Moreira et al (2012), Carey et al (2006), Godin et al (2010) and Kvalem et al (1996) did not find QBE at 12 months. Only Godin et al (2008) found a sustained significant QBE at 12 months (SMD=0.08, 95% CI = 0.02, 0.14; n= 6835).…”
Section: Long Term Effects (K= 4)supporting
confidence: 73%
“…In line with Moreira et al (2012), Carey et al (2006), Godin et al (2010) and Kvalem et al (1996) did not find QBE at 12 months. Only Godin et al (2008) found a sustained significant QBE at 12 months (SMD=0.08, 95% CI = 0.02, 0.14; n= 6835).…”
Section: Long Term Effects (K= 4)supporting
confidence: 73%
“…These results are consistent with other studies 10,12 . Although knowledge about alcohol by itsef is not sufficient to change behaviors, it is required to construct an accurate perception of the risks effects associated with alcohol consumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The studies conducted in this area value the development of protective factors, including knowledge about alcohol, expectations about alcohol, social skills and perceptions about consumption by their peers [9][10][11][12][13] , whose contributions of the scientific evidence integrate the intervention program, Stop To Think, which is presented here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further 16 studies did not meet the age range criteria (Bewick et al, 2013;Enggasser et al, 2015;Sinadinovic et al, 2014., Bendtsen & Bendtsen, 2014., Bendtsen et al, 2015Bewick et al, 2010;Doumas et al, 2014;Ekman et al, 2011;Kypri et al, 2010;Kypri et al, 2013;Lotfipour et al, 2013;McCambridge et al, 2013;Moreira, Oskrochi & Foxcroft, 2012;Schulz, Kremers & de Vries, 2012;Schulz et al, 2013;Tensil, Jonas & Str眉ber, 2013). Four papers were simply commentaries on other studies, or reviews (Cronce et al, 2014;Naimi & Cole, 2014;Rodriguez et al, 2015), whilst one study discussed the method of designing a behaviour change intervention (Voogt et al, 2014c), resulting in exclusion from this review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%