2018
DOI: 10.1080/1369183x.2018.1444470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality and ideological bases of anti-immigrant prejudice among Croatian youth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings were corroborated in subsequent research (e.g. for SDO-Agreeableness association, see Cohrs et al, 2012;Heaven et al, 2011;Hodson et al, 2009;Matić et al, 2019;Perry & Sibley, 2012; for SDO-Openness association, see Cohrs et al, 2012;Heaven et al, 2011;Matić et al, 2019;. The association of SDO with Big Five Neuroticism, Conscientiousness and Extraversion appeared to be insignificant (for meta-analytical evidence, see Sibley & Duckitt, 2008).…”
Section: Sdo and Personalitysupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings were corroborated in subsequent research (e.g. for SDO-Agreeableness association, see Cohrs et al, 2012;Heaven et al, 2011;Hodson et al, 2009;Matić et al, 2019;Perry & Sibley, 2012; for SDO-Openness association, see Cohrs et al, 2012;Heaven et al, 2011;Matić et al, 2019;. The association of SDO with Big Five Neuroticism, Conscientiousness and Extraversion appeared to be insignificant (for meta-analytical evidence, see Sibley & Duckitt, 2008).…”
Section: Sdo and Personalitysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Additionally, the order of the items was changed to ensure the alternating order of pro-and con-trait items, and the format of the scale was modified, from the original 7-point to 5-point scale. Skokandić's (2013) version of Sidanius and Pratto's (1999) SDO5 scale functioned adequately in previous studies on a large representative Croatian sample (Matić et al, 2019). The Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of the scale in the present study was .74.…”
Section: Social Dominance Orientationsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…But as noted by Duckitt and Sibley (2010), the items used to assess both RWA and SDO reflect beliefs rather than trans-situational behavioral tendencies characteristic of traits. Moreover, studies that examine the ordering of traits/values, attitudes, and outcomes reveal that RWA and SDO mediate the relationships traits and values have with prejudice (Chirumbolo et al, 2016; Cichocka et al, 2017; Duriez et al, 2005; Matić et al, 2019). Interpreted accordingly, our results suggest that RWA and SDO are highly stable social attitudes (rather than personality traits).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the past, New Zealand was thought of as a welcoming and inclusive nation, events in Christchurch challenge that view. Anti-immigrant prejudice is rooted in attitudes captured by self-report scales measuring mindsets such as a Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) and Right Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) across various age groups and ethnicities (Matić & Bratko, 2018;Caricati, Mancini & Marletta, 2016). In New Zealand, RWA is found to be most strongly related with anti-immigration attitudes and SDO with low warmth toward people of Chinese origin (Satherley & Sibley, 2016).…”
Section: University Of Otagomentioning
confidence: 99%