1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01059.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PERSONALITY AND LANGUAGE BEHAVIOR: A RESTATEMENT1

Abstract: This restatement of the theoretical framework underlying the research program of the University of Michigan Personality and Language Behavior Research Group addresses two theoretical issues that are at present particularly relevant to a theory of second language acquisition: the statue of constructs in the theory that have been transported or transposed from other fields, and the process (and criteria) of theory validation. Defining and assessing the value of “borrowed” constructs is of course serious concern … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The talent for mimicry has been identified in second-langue speech research as a significant predictor of a degree of L2 foreign accent Purcell & Suter, 1980;Suter, 1976;Thompson, 1991). It is also considered as a subcomponent of language aptitude for pronunciation in L2 connected with empathy and the ability to overcome the 'ego boundary' (Guiora, 1967;Guiora & Acton, 1979;Guiora et al, 1972;Hu et al, 2013). More research is needed to determine the degree of influence of the talent for mimicry in the imitation of FL accent in L1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The talent for mimicry has been identified in second-langue speech research as a significant predictor of a degree of L2 foreign accent Purcell & Suter, 1980;Suter, 1976;Thompson, 1991). It is also considered as a subcomponent of language aptitude for pronunciation in L2 connected with empathy and the ability to overcome the 'ego boundary' (Guiora, 1967;Guiora & Acton, 1979;Guiora et al, 1972;Hu et al, 2013). More research is needed to determine the degree of influence of the talent for mimicry in the imitation of FL accent in L1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, learners report thinking in the target language and adopting clothing or eating styles of the target language community in order to perform better in the target language or fit in better among the target language group. The concept of L2 self, language ego, or language ego boundaries to FL or L2 language learning or acquisition has been stated in the previous studies (e.g., Guiora et al, 1975;Guiora & Acton, 1979;Horwitz et al, 1986). Horwitz et al (1986) claimed that the concept of language anxiety could be a unique emotion or experience only associated with learning the target language.…”
Section: Language Ego L2/fl Self or Language Identitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They assumed that "language ego is a maturational concept and likewise refers to self-representation with physical outlines and firm boundaries" (p. 45). Guiora and Acton (1979) claimed that the concept of "permeability of language ego boundaries" (p. 199) refers to language learners' ability to "move back and forth between languages" (p. 199) and the switch of the "personalities" (p. 199) that seem to come from the immersion of the target language. This idea is similar to the common agreement that a language learner "feels like a different person" (p. 199) when speaking a L2 or FL and often acts somehow differently as well.…”
Section: Language Ego L2/fl Self or Language Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) Within the context of a teaching-learning environment, the potentially favourable conditions must be made available, which may counterbalance any anxiety-related reactions from the ILs, as they attempt to use the L/C 2 (Horwitz/ Horwitz/Cope 1986;Young 1986) Motivation plays a key role in the process of learning an L/C 2 (Dörnyei 2007 Collaboration and scaffolding-based learning theories (Bruner 1998), seem an adequate pathway to set up pedagogical environments aiming at making language ego boundaries more permeable (Guiora/Acton 1979). ) Within the context of a teaching-learning environment, the potentially favourable conditions must be made available, which may counterbalance any anxiety-related reactions from the ILs, as they attempt to use the L/C 2 (Horwitz/ Horwitz/Cope 1986;Young 1986) Motivation plays a key role in the process of learning an L/C 2 (Dörnyei 2007 Collaboration and scaffolding-based learning theories (Bruner 1998), seem an adequate pathway to set up pedagogical environments aiming at making language ego boundaries more permeable (Guiora/Acton 1979).…”
Section: Situated Learning and Pedagogical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%