Individual Differences in Movement 1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-4912-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality and motor activity: a psychophysiological perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another view of the slower RT for higher neuroticism scorers is suggested by their association with smaller CNV amplitude. First, there is a good deal of evidence that high-anxious subjects exhibit smaller CNV amplitude (Stelmack, 1985). CNV amplitude is widely regarded as an electrophysiological index of anticipation and preparation to act, especially motor action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another view of the slower RT for higher neuroticism scorers is suggested by their association with smaller CNV amplitude. First, there is a good deal of evidence that high-anxious subjects exhibit smaller CNV amplitude (Stelmack, 1985). CNV amplitude is widely regarded as an electrophysiological index of anticipation and preparation to act, especially motor action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses of individual differences in the response to sensory stimulation and in the expression of motor responses are important sources of evidence for several proposals that have been put forward in the explanation of personality differences, notably extraversion, impulsiveness, and anxiety (Barratt, 1972;Brebner & Cooper, 1974;H. J. Eysenck, 1957;Newman, 1987;Stelmack, 1985). The present article aims to articulate differences in the processing of stimuli and production of responses that are relevant to the biological bases of those personality dimensions by exploiting relatively recent refinements in eventrelated potential (ERP) and reaction time (RT) measures that are recorded during the performance of simple cognitive tasks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several behavioural and psychophysiological studies demonstrated greater sensory reaction to simple physical stimulation for introverts than for extraverts (e.g., Dornic & Ekehammar, 1990;Geen, 1984;Kohn, 1987;Smith, 1968;Stelmack, 1981Stelmack, , 1990Stelmack, Achorn, & Michaud, 1977;Stenberg, Rosen, & Risberg, 1990). Furthermore, there is a good deal of evidence that affirms differences between introverts and extraverts in their performance on various tasks that assess speed of responding and motor control (e.g., Barratt, 1967;Brebner, 1985;Doucet & Stelmack, 1997Rammsayer, 1995;Stelmack, 1985;Stelmack, Houlihan, & McGarry-Roberts, 1993). A pharmacopsychological study by Rammsayer, Netter, and Vogel (1993) provided the first evidence for a DA-related neural process that appears to be implicated in the mediation of both the sensory and the motor effects that distinguish introverts and extraverts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects appear to meld with the preference of introverts for quiet and solitude (Campbell & Hawley, 1982;Dornic & Ekehammar, 1990) and with their tendency toward withdrawal as a coping strategy in stressful social situations (Endler & Parker, 1990). Second, introverts and extraverts are shown to differ in their expression of motor behavior on a variety of tasks that require a simple motor response, with extraverts tending to initiate faster and more frequent responses than introverts (Stelmack, 1985). These effects also appear consistent with, the disposition of extraverts to greater spontaneity, social disinhibition, impulsiveness (Barratt & Patton, 1983;Eysenck & Eysenck, 1991;Newman, 1987), and general physical activity compared with introverts (Eysenck, Nias, & Cox, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%