1998
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality and organizations: A test of the homogeneity of personality hypothesis.

Abstract: Center for Creative LeadershipA central proposition of attraction-selection-attrition theory (B. Schneider, 1987) and of the literature on organizational socialization was tested. Support for the hypothesis that organizations are relatively homogeneous with respect to the personality attributes of their managers was found. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) conducted on a sample of approximately 13,000 managers from 142 organizations representing a broad cross-sample of U.S. industries revealed a sig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
278
2
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 333 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
15
278
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Important for the present study is that this stream of research suggests "that employers tend to replace organizational members with people who are similar to themselves" (Lawrence, 1997: 18), leading to homogeneity especially at the upper management level of organizations (Schneider et al, 1998). This view extends to include demographic similarity.…”
Section: Forces Pulling Toward Homogeneitymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Important for the present study is that this stream of research suggests "that employers tend to replace organizational members with people who are similar to themselves" (Lawrence, 1997: 18), leading to homogeneity especially at the upper management level of organizations (Schneider et al, 1998). This view extends to include demographic similarity.…”
Section: Forces Pulling Toward Homogeneitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In other words, we could directly observe the phenomenon of interest. Concerning the exit process, this ASA argument suggests that individuals who do not fit a team tend to leave or "be relieved," as has consistently been shown in the research on turnover (Carroll & Harrison, 1998;Schneider et al, 1998). That is,…”
Section: Forces Pulling Toward Homogeneitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Demonstrating these relationships is contingent, in part, on ensuring adequate variability of the independent measures. Because variability is often constrained when collecting data from one organization (e.g., Schneider, Smith, Taylor, & Fleenor, 1998), researchers need to MS# 2003 Emergence of State Goal Orientation 28 ensure that work group leaders have significant latitude in managing their work groups, and/or consider collecting data from multiple organizations. Another challenge in testing the present model in a field setting involves issues of control.…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Research and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for this is provided by the attraction-selection-attrition (ASA) framework, which predicts that the individuals most likely to be attracted to, and selected for, positions within an organization are those who fit its values and identity. The framework also predicts that these individuals are more likely to stay with the organization (Schneider 1987;Schneider et al 1998;Turban and Keon 1993).…”
Section: Team Attributes and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%