2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality and serotonin transporter genotype interact with social context to affect immunity and viral set-point in simian immunodeficiency virus disease

Abstract: From the beginning of the AIDS epidemic, stress has been a suspected contributor to the wide variation seen in disease progression, and some evidence supports this idea. Not all individuals respond to a stressor in the same way, however, and little is known about the biological mechanisms by which variations in individuals' responses to their environment affect disease-relevant immunologic processes. Using the simian immunodeficiency virus/rhesus macaque model of AIDS, we explored how personality (sociability)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, by the end of treatment, social status differences in serum LH were no longer evident, suggesting the system was maximally suppressed at that time by this dose of E2. Nevertheless, these observations add support to pervious reports that individuals with this genotype are more vulnerable to the adverse consequences of social subordination [28] or other types of psychosocial stress [20,25,[57][58][59]. This finding should be expanded to a larger population analysis to confirm whether SLC6A4 polymorphisms potentiate stress-induced reproductive compromise via enhanced E2-negative feedback inhibition.…”
Section: Serum Lhsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Importantly, by the end of treatment, social status differences in serum LH were no longer evident, suggesting the system was maximally suppressed at that time by this dose of E2. Nevertheless, these observations add support to pervious reports that individuals with this genotype are more vulnerable to the adverse consequences of social subordination [28] or other types of psychosocial stress [20,25,[57][58][59]. This finding should be expanded to a larger population analysis to confirm whether SLC6A4 polymorphisms potentiate stress-induced reproductive compromise via enhanced E2-negative feedback inhibition.…”
Section: Serum Lhsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Humans and rhesus monkeys, particularly adult individuals, likewise both display stable and pronounced individual differences in social functioning. Moreover, Low-Social (LS) monkeys initiate fewer approaches and groom-presents and spend less time in conspecific proximity than do High-Social (HS) monkeys [4,5], suggesting that LS and HS monkeys differ in their motivation to interact with others. LS monkeys also receive fewer approaches, lipsmacks, and groom-presents compared to HS monkeys, indicating that LS animals may be perceived as less socially attractive [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifth, and related to the previous point, there has been growing recognition that “one size does not fit all;” that is, the relationship between precipitating factors on the one hand (e.g., adverse early experiences, encounter with a pathogen) and physical or psychological disease outcomes on the other hand is often moderated by host factors, such as sex, genotype, and personality. In human medicine, this has been referred to as “personalized medicine,” and parallel studies in nonhuman primates of moderated relationships involving, for example, personality and genotype, [e.g., Capitanio et al, 2008] fit easily within, and contribute to, this development in medicine. Sixth, there has been a greater awareness that the management of captive populations of nonhuman primates must focus not only on preventing disease, but must also attend to the social needs of these highly social animals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%