2016
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality and Social Framing in Privacy Decision-Making: A Study on Cookie Acceptance

Abstract: Despite their best intentions, people struggle with the realities of privacy protection and will often sacrifice privacy for convenience in their online activities. Individuals show systematic, personality dependent differences in their privacy decision making, which makes it interesting for those who seek to design ‘nudges’ designed to manipulate privacy behaviors. We explore such effects in a cookie decision task. Two hundred and ninety participants were given an incidental website review task that masked th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Patient personality traits and demographics might influence privacy preferences in social media use (Coventry et al 2016;Egleman and Peer, 2015;Acquisti and Grossklags, 2005;Krasnova et al, 2012). Individuals' intentions also likely mitigate privacy concerns and self-disclosure (Bazarova and Choi, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient personality traits and demographics might influence privacy preferences in social media use (Coventry et al 2016;Egleman and Peer, 2015;Acquisti and Grossklags, 2005;Krasnova et al, 2012). Individuals' intentions also likely mitigate privacy concerns and self-disclosure (Bazarova and Choi, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings further point to the potential for privacy nudges to be tailored to the individual traits of users. In a separate study, Coventry et al examined the effects of a single nudge on cookie acceptance for web browsers [12]. The authors measure several personality traits, but fail to find evidence that the traits moderate the effectiveness of the nudge.…”
Section: Tailored Nudgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this is potentially highly significant, it only encompasses a portion of the range of potential Big Five Extraversion scores and indicates that the effect may be fragile. 12 6.2.4 Johnson-Neyman Analysis. In addition to our regression analysis, we examined our data for Study 2 and Study 3 using the Johnson-Neyman technique.…”
Section: Logistic Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of social influence privacy nudges is based on the principle of social norms. The individual derives to what extent it is appropriate to share personal information from the behavior of his fellow users [30,31]. The majority's decision influences the perception and the behavior of users in a way [28] that others get the feeling of trying to imitate the behavior of the majority [31].…”
Section: Progress Barmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual derives to what extent it is appropriate to share personal information from the behavior of his fellow users [30,31]. The majority's decision influences the perception and the behavior of users in a way [28] that others get the feeling of trying to imitate the behavior of the majority [31]. The more people have the same opinion on a particular topic, the more likely it is to elicit the same opinion in others [27] because behavior of like-minded people leads to individual behavior [32].…”
Section: Progress Barmentioning
confidence: 99%