Personality and team performance: a meta‐analysis

Peeters, Miranda A. G.; Tuijl, H.F.J.M. van; Rutte, Christel G.; Reymen, I.M.M.J.

doi:10.1002/per.588

Cited by 271 publications

(293 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

264

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Peeters et al (2006), Keyton and Beck (2008) stated that arranging work into teams that have a mixture of complementary skills, knowledge, attitudes and other characteristics is more effective that if the members work individually.Therefore, teamwork has become indispensable in many organizations. (Mohammed and Ringseis, 2001;Salas et al, 1995).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of Design Team Attributes on Green Design Performance of Building Projects

Elforgani¹,

Rahmat

2012

EMSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The design phase is the most important phase in determining the green performance of building projects. The performance of the design team is crucial. The growing importance of sustainability globally necessitates the inclusion of green criteria in the design team selection process. Therefore, a competent design teams is required to have a range of attributes as the basis for design decisions. The propose of this study to identify current green design performance level of design teams of building projects and establish key design attributes influencing green design performance. To achieve mentioned aim a questionnaire survey was conducted to collect dada required. A sample of 274 respondents has been covered under the study, including architects and engineers practicing design and consultancy building sectors. Prior to analysis of data WINSTEPS software were used to determine validity and reliability of date. Descriptive analysis data includes quantitative and qualitative. In general, design team attributes were moderate (3.32). The general design team attributes were high such experience (3.81), communication (3.43) and leadership effectiveness (3.48). However, green attributes of design team were moderate such as green knowledge (2.98), green skills (3.13) and green initiatives (2.84).The result indicates that most design teams have inadequate knowledge and skills to produce high green design performance of building projects. Therefore, to overcome green design complexity, careful selecting design team members and more education and training courses on green building are required to deal with green design requirements.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of Design Team Attributes on Green Design Performance of Building Projects

Elforgani¹,

Rahmat

2012

EMSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A person who is high in agreeableness is also more willing to help others. The facets associated with agreeableness include trust, straightforwardness, altruism, compliance, modesty, and tender-mindedness (Costa & McCrae, 1992 The meta-analysis by Mount et al (1998) The study conducted by Barrick et al (1998) As discussed, there is a significant amount of literature regarding the effect of the traits of individual team members on team performance (Peeters et al, 2006;Mount et al, 1998;Barrick et al, 1998;van Vianen & Dreu, 2001;Neuman et al, 1999;Kichuk & Wiesner, 1997;and Halfhill et al, 2005). It would seem, however, that with the existence of five separate personality traits, the mere existence or absence of one trait alone would not be enough to cause an entire team to be successful or unsuccessful.…”

Section: Agreeableness (A) Is the Extent To Which A Person Ismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Conscientiousness is widely considered to be an accurate indicator of individual performance (Peeters et al, 2006, Kichuk & Wiesner, 1997 A study conducted by van Vianen and de Dreu (2001) examined 24 teams involved in drilling operations in…”

Section: Conscientiousness (C)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In separate meta-analyses, Mount, Barrick and Stewart (1998) and Peeters et al (2006) The study utilized 328 employees of a large retail organization. The employees were organized into four-person teams based on geographic location and product specialty.…”

Section: A the Neo-ffi Personality Traits And Personality Stylesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The rationale behind the use of teams is that the combination of the individual skills, knowledge and attitudes of individuals will result in improved mission accomplishment (Peeters, Van Tuijl, Rutte, & Reyman, 2006 (Costa & Piedmont, 2003). By determining and analyzing the personality traits and styles of the individuals in a team, it may be possible to predict the success of that team.…”

Section: Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Effect of Personality Style and Team Organization on Team Performance

Hannen¹

2007

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words)The continual advancement of technology and the increasing complexity of the operational environments for the military have necessitated the proliferation of teambased operations. The use of personality styles is one possible way to go beyond normal demographics when attempting to predict team performance. This study provides an analysis of two personality styles and their potential for predicting team performance.The tenets of Human Systems Integration (HSI) state that it is critical to view the human as a component of any system. This study examined the effect of team personality style on team performance. Additionally, the effect of team command and control organization was examined by building upon the Office of Naval Research's Adaptive Architecture for Command and Control (A 2 C 2 ) project.The results of the study were inconclusive. There was no significant difference between the performance of teams high in conscientiousness and high in agreeableness (A+C+) and the performance of teams low in conscientiousness and low in agreeableness (A-C-). Furthermore, there was no difference between teams utilizing different command and control organizations. The results of the study reveal that, currently, A+C+ and A-C-personality styles are not viable as selection tools Further research concerning the many possible personality styles is required. NUMBER OF PAGES 81 SUBJECT TERMS

show abstract

Use and Importance of Personality Variables in Work Settings

Hough¹,

Johnson

2012

Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Personality and team performance: a meta‐analysis

Cited by 271 publications

References 44 publications

The Influence of Design Team Attributes on Green Design Performance of Building Projects

The Influence of Design Team Attributes on Green Design Performance of Building Projects

The Effect of Personality Style and Team Organization on Team Performance

Use and Importance of Personality Variables in Work Settings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About