2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(200003/04)14:2<157::aid-per366>3.3.co;2-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality and the use of intuition: individual differences in strategy and performance on an implicit learning task

Abstract: There is a divergence of opinion regarding the existence of individual differences in the use of intuition, ranging from intuition being the preserve of a creative minority to intuition as a basic cognitive process that is equally accessible to all. The existence and nature of individual differences in the use of intuition were explored by studying relationships between the sensing–intuition scale of the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator and strategy and performance on an implicit learning task. Results indicated di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mere use of intuition, however, is not a panacea for the speed-accuracy trade-off, since its use may simply facilitate speed at the expense of accuracy. Therefore, we need to better understand those conditions that foster the effective use of intuition to complement existing work on when intuition is simply most likely to be used (e.g., Ruder & Bless, 2003;Sinclair, Ashkanasy, Chat-topadhyay, & Boyle, 2002;Woolhouse & Bayne, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mere use of intuition, however, is not a panacea for the speed-accuracy trade-off, since its use may simply facilitate speed at the expense of accuracy. Therefore, we need to better understand those conditions that foster the effective use of intuition to complement existing work on when intuition is simply most likely to be used (e.g., Ruder & Bless, 2003;Sinclair, Ashkanasy, Chat-topadhyay, & Boyle, 2002;Woolhouse & Bayne, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously discussed, accuracy on the GJT was primarily driven by participants’ explicit knowledge of the L2 syntax. This may have limited the influence of openness and intuition in the task, which are strongly associated with implicit learning processes (Kaufman et al, 2010; Woolhouse & Bayne, 2000). As for FLA, the design of this experiment, which included a semiartificial language with English vocabulary, may offer a plausible explanation for the lack of influence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers found significant relationships between implicit learning and the personality characteristics of impulsivity, intuition, and openness to experience. Among 43 participants, Woolhouse and Bayne (2000) also found strong correlations between implicit learning and intuition. They noted that intuitive individuals tended to better utilize unconscious knowledge.…”
Section: Emotions In Incidental Language Learning: An Individual Diffmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There have been several publications related to the practical applications of the type theory in the business environment, particularly in the field of human resources management; these include type and career (Hammer, 2007;Stilwell et al, 2000;Kovar, 2003), type 86 ET 56,1 and career development (Dunning, 2005;Felder and Brent, 2005), type and retention (Hammer, 2003), type and teams (Hirsh et al, 2003;Adams, 2004), type and conflict management (Killen and Murphy, 2003;Clinebell, 2003), type and its relation to values and interests (Jarlstrom, 2000;Johnson and Coppola, 1990;Pearson and Dollinger, 2003), type and strategic planning and decision-making process (Jennings and Disney, 2006;Hough and Ogilvie, 2005), type and mental information processing (Edwards, 2003;Woolhouse and Bayne, 2000), type and academic performance (Kahn et al, 2002;Felder and Brent, 2005), and type and learning (Cassidy, 2004;Li et al, 2008;Worthington and Clay, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%