2022
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2033248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality Assessment in Legal Contexts: Introduction to the Special Issue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we focus on predictive validity, this review was also written in a similar spirit as the articles in a recent special issue of the Journal of Personality Assessment focusing on psychometric properties and legal admissibility of a variety of psychological measures used in forensic evaluations (Neal et al, 2022).…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we focus on predictive validity, this review was also written in a similar spirit as the articles in a recent special issue of the Journal of Personality Assessment focusing on psychometric properties and legal admissibility of a variety of psychological measures used in forensic evaluations (Neal et al, 2022).…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2022 is er in het Journal of Personality Assessment een special issue verschenen waarin reviews werden gepubliceerd over veertien verschillende (forensisch) psychologische instrumenten 1 en de wetenschappelijk basis voor hun toepassing in de rechtbank (Neal et al, 2022a). Voor elk instrument worden de krachten en de beperkingen aangehaald die gerechtsdeskundigen kunnen helpen bij het voorbereiden van hun rapportage en eventuele getuigenis in de rechtbank, die advocaten kunnen helpen bij het kritisch bevragen van het gebruik van deze instrumenten, en die tot slot ook rechters kunnen helpen bij het evalueren van de ontvankelijkheid van een instrument in een specifieke zaak (Neal et al, 2022b). Vooral dit laatste is een belangrijk aandachtspunt, aangezien onderzoek aantoont dat pseudowetenschap, zoals niet-gevalideerde instrumenten, nog steeds regelmatig een ingang vindt in de rechtbank (Neal et al, 2019).…”
Section: Special Issue Over Psychologische Instrumenten In De Rechtbankunclassified
“…In Peru, it is difficult to use imported clinical instruments that measure PD -e.g., the Minnesota ISSN (Digital): 2223-7666 Liberabit, 2022, 28(1), e540 (enero -junio) Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-3; Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2020b), the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey, 2007), or the Multiaxial Clinical Inventory of Millon (MCMI-IV;Millon et al, 2015)-because they do not fit to the special features of the level of education, culture, and/ or statistical disposition of the prison population (Carlson, 1981). Despite the fact that the authors of these measures have elaborated interpretation guides for the evaluation of personality in prison environments, and although the psychometric evidence -questionably-supports said measures (Neal et al, 2022), the items have been formulated based on the specific characteristics of clinical populations so that they can hardly be adjusted to those of the inmates of the Peruvian correctional system.…”
Section: The Need For a Comprehensive Measure Of Icd-11 Pd In Correct...mentioning
confidence: 99%