Personality Disorders in the ICD-11: Opportunities and Challenges for Advancing the Diagnosis of Personality Pathology

Empirical foundation of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders.

“…Note. The presented convergences with ICD-11 trait domains are conceptually and empirically supported (Carnovale et al, 2020;Crego & Widiger, 2020;Gutiérrez et al, 2020;Kerber et al, 2020;Kim et al, 2020;McCabe & Widiger, 2020;Oltmanns & Widiger, 2018, 2020Sellbom et al, 2020;Somma et al, 2020;Tarescavage & Menton, 2020). with respect to clinical information and guidelines.…”

“…For a more detailed overview of the entire scientific and political process, including the initial drafts of the proposed model, we refer to Tyrer et al (2019) and Huprich (2020).…”

Semi‐structured interview for personality functioning DSM‐5 (STiP‐5.1): Psychometric evaluation of the Czech version

“…The measures assessing the personality dysfunctions according to ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines are still scarce (Huprich, 2020), and only the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD; Olajide et al, 2018) was introduced as a self-report measure assessing the severity of personality dysfunctions. However, it has been argued that AMPD measures of personality functioning may be used to assess personality disorder severity according to ICD-11 based on their similarities (Bach & First, 2018).…”

The clinical utility of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders and related traits: A preliminary scoping review

“…Future investigation of the ICD-11 PD classification system’s (a) communicative value between clinicians and their patients, and between clinicians and their patient’s families; (b) ease of use; and (c) feasibility in terms of practical application is required to bring clarity to the ICD-11 PD classification’s blurred picture of clinical utility. A diagnostic model should serve the function of a decision tool for its practitioners and have significant utility in clinical management and treatment planning (Bach, 2018, 2020; Bach and Presnall-Shvorin, 2020; Bach and Simonsen, 2020; Huprich, 2020). In essence, while still requiring further research, the WHO’s shift to dimensionality can be considered as a step in the right direction in adhering to their primary aim; of first and foremost providing a useful diagnostic scheme for clinicians worldwide that ultimately aids the reduction of suffering among individuals with mental disorders (First et al, 2004; Hansen et al, 2019; Keeley et al, 2016).…”