1988
DOI: 10.1159/000118459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality, Effort Perception and Cardiovascular Reactivity

Abstract: Ratings of perceived exertion and neuroendocrine reactivity (plasma catecholamines) were measured in type A and type B student volunteers during a metabolically equivalent physical stressor (cycle ergometry). Analysis of variance demonstrated that type A underrated the perception of exertion as compared to type B. Therefore, this neuropsychobiological interaction could partly explain the relationship between type A and the tissue pathology in the development of accentuated coronary heart disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that (a) the more people desire to impress others, the lower they tend to report their perceived exertion (Boutcher, Fleischer-Curtian, & Gines, 1988); ( b) augmenters (i.e., people who exaggerate the importance of events in their life) report greater perceived exertion than do reducers (i.e., people who underestimate the importance of events in their life; Robertson, Gillespie, Hiatt, & Rose, 1977); (c) internal and external locus of control fails to determine perceived exertion (Kohl & Shea, 1988); (d) feminine sex-typed women report greater perceived exertion than do masculine or androgynous women (Hochstetler, Rejeski, & Best, 1985); (e) extraverts suppress painful stimuli and rate their perceived exertion lower than introverts (Morgan, 1973); and (f ) self-efficacy is negatively related to perceived exertion (McAuley & Courneya, 1992). A clear relationship between Type A / B personality and perceived exertion has not been established (De Meersman, 1988;Hardy, McMurray, & Roberts, 1989;Rejeski, Morley, & Miller, 1983).…”
Section: A Guiding Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that (a) the more people desire to impress others, the lower they tend to report their perceived exertion (Boutcher, Fleischer-Curtian, & Gines, 1988); ( b) augmenters (i.e., people who exaggerate the importance of events in their life) report greater perceived exertion than do reducers (i.e., people who underestimate the importance of events in their life; Robertson, Gillespie, Hiatt, & Rose, 1977); (c) internal and external locus of control fails to determine perceived exertion (Kohl & Shea, 1988); (d) feminine sex-typed women report greater perceived exertion than do masculine or androgynous women (Hochstetler, Rejeski, & Best, 1985); (e) extraverts suppress painful stimuli and rate their perceived exertion lower than introverts (Morgan, 1973); and (f ) self-efficacy is negatively related to perceived exertion (McAuley & Courneya, 1992). A clear relationship between Type A / B personality and perceived exertion has not been established (De Meersman, 1988;Hardy, McMurray, & Roberts, 1989;Rejeski, Morley, & Miller, 1983).…”
Section: A Guiding Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have concluded that exercise tolerance was overestimated in men and women exhibiting the Type A Behavior Pattern (TABP) [9,11,12,27] presumably because Type As were motivated to suppress ratings of exertion in order to perform at a maximal level [9]. Moreover it has been proposed that the TABP increases health risks during exercise [33] though a later study of 1260 patients at risk for coronary artery disease found that Type A and Type B patients who completed a diagnostic exercise test did not differ on exercise time, maximum heart rate, or the predictive validity of the test [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%