Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3406499.3415075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality in Healthcare Human Robot Interaction (H-HRI)

Abstract: Robots are becoming an important way to deliver health care, and personality is vital to understanding their effectiveness. Despite this, there is a lack of a systematic overarching understanding of personality in health care human robot interaction (H-HRI). To address this, the authors conducted a review that identified 18 studies on personality in H-HRI. This paper presents the results of that systematic literature review. Insights are derived from this review regarding the methodologies, outcomes, and sampl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The trust and risk propensity questionnaires showed that our participants were less prone to take risks (M 4.05, SD 1.32) than the general population (Meertens and Lion, 2008) yet more prone to trust (Mayer and Davis, 1999) (M 2.93, SD 0.61). We used the cognitive trust items described in Section 3.3 as a rating of the robot's performance to compare our population to other findings compiled by Esterwood and Robert (2020): we found a very strong correlation between the cognitive and affective trust items (r 0.82, p 7.2e − 23), confirming that cognitive and affective trust go hand in hand.…”
Section: Population Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The trust and risk propensity questionnaires showed that our participants were less prone to take risks (M 4.05, SD 1.32) than the general population (Meertens and Lion, 2008) yet more prone to trust (Mayer and Davis, 1999) (M 2.93, SD 0.61). We used the cognitive trust items described in Section 3.3 as a rating of the robot's performance to compare our population to other findings compiled by Esterwood and Robert (2020): we found a very strong correlation between the cognitive and affective trust items (r 0.82, p 7.2e − 23), confirming that cognitive and affective trust go hand in hand.…”
Section: Population Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Currently, there is no representation for the 65+ age group in the literature. Practically, when we consider that a large segment of robotic technologies are increasingly targeting health care for those older than 65, we can begin to see an issue with existing sampling (see: [28]). This is an issue because according to table 7, the importance of personality on predicting robot acceptance seems to diminish by age.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is now a tendency to assume that at least one of the Big Five personality traits can be used to understand whether a person will accept a robot [81,82]. Despite this intuitive appeal, several literature reviews on the topic have highlighted inconsistencies in the relationship between human personality and the acceptance of robots [28,82]. However, none of those studies engaged in a systematic quantitative meta-analysis to empirically examine this relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth mentioning that prior to conducting the systematic literature review, authors assessed its novelty. Authors acknowledge the existence of several systematic literature reviews in the broad field of robotics [52][53][54][55][56], some of them in the field of human-robot interaction [57][58][59][60]. However, in the specific field of social robots, there are two works worth mention, one on the interaction with sexbots [61] and another on specific design guidelines for social robots for the elderly [62].…”
Section: Systematic Literature Review Using Prisma Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%