2006
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality Judgments from Natural and Composite Facial Images: More Evidence For A “Kernel Of Truth” In Social Perception

Abstract: In addition to signaling identity, sex, age, and emotional state, people frequently use facial characteristics as a basis for personality attributions. Typically, there is a high degree of consensus in the attributions made to faces. Nevertheless, the extent to which such judgments are veridical is unclear and somewhat controversial. We have examined the relationship between self-report and perceived personality using both faces of individuals and computer graphic composites. Photographs were taken of 146 men … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
287
7
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
21
287
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of a relationship between observer ratings and self-reported personality scores contrasts with studies reporting a Kernel of Truth in ratings of personality traits (Borkenau, et al, 2004;Penton-Voak, et al, 2006). Accurate and early decisions of traits such as neuroticism can be considered advantageous since prediction of immediate behaviour carries an adaptive advantage (Barrett, et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of a relationship between observer ratings and self-reported personality scores contrasts with studies reporting a Kernel of Truth in ratings of personality traits (Borkenau, et al, 2004;Penton-Voak, et al, 2006). Accurate and early decisions of traits such as neuroticism can be considered advantageous since prediction of immediate behaviour carries an adaptive advantage (Barrett, et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This approach is the most common for studies that assess the Kernel of Truth hypothesis (Borkenau & Liebler, 1992;Borkenau, et al, 2004;Penton-Voak, et al, 2006). The Big Five scores from the NEO FFI SF (Costa & McCrae, 1992) -administered to targets prior to the motion capture procedure -were used as self-reported traits, and these were evaluated in relation to their corresponding rating scales from the observers (see 2.1.1).…”
Section: The Relationship Between Self-reported and Perceived Personamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We are only aware of one study that found inter-rater agreement in Big Five judgments from photographs of faces (Penton-Voak, Pound, Little, & Perrett, 2006). Because photographs show extra-facial information, we do not know whether agreement is based upon facial or extra-facial styling information.…”
Section: Changing the Personality Of A Facementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different attempts at investigating accuracy of personality judgments from facial photographs (Kramer & Ward, 2010;Little & Perrett, 2007;Penton-Voak et al, 2006) the modeling approach applied here in that it visualizes actual personality dimensions instead of the ideas or stereotypes of personality dimensions, but also in it's applicability to generate face CHANGING THE PERSONALITY OF A FACE 12 stimuli. On the one hand it does not allow for systematic and gradual manipulations of the salience of a specific personality dimension, on the other hand, it cannot be applied to novel faces.…”
Section: Visualizing Personality In Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%