2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality predicts social dominance in female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, in a feeding context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
154
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
7
154
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Having a short recovery time may mean that more stings can be landed on the opponent, which increases the chance of victory in escalated fights. Similarly, in contests over dominance status in rainbowfish, Melanotaenia duboulayi [18], zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata [19], and domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus [5], dominant individuals are consistently more proactive when not fighting and more aggressive during fights. Thus, personality traits such as boldness not only covary with aggressiveness but also, in many cases, with RHP itself.…”
Section: Is Personality a Resource-holding Potential Trait?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having a short recovery time may mean that more stings can be landed on the opponent, which increases the chance of victory in escalated fights. Similarly, in contests over dominance status in rainbowfish, Melanotaenia duboulayi [18], zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata [19], and domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus [5], dominant individuals are consistently more proactive when not fighting and more aggressive during fights. Thus, personality traits such as boldness not only covary with aggressiveness but also, in many cases, with RHP itself.…”
Section: Is Personality a Resource-holding Potential Trait?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of nonhuman animals have shown that personality traits are ubiquitous in the animal kingdom; a wide range of fish (Mittelbach, Ballew, & Kjelvik, 2014;Toms, Echevarria, & Jouandot, 2010), birds (e.g., chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus, Favati, Leimar, & Lovlie, 2014; zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, David, Auclair, & Cezilly, 2011, Schuett, Dall, & Royle, 2011Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica, Miller, Garner, & Mench, 2006), numerous mammal species (e.g., pigs, Sus domesticus, Marino & Colvin, 2015;horses, Equus caballus, Hausberger, Bruderer, Le Scolan, & Pierre, 2004;dogs, Canis familiaris, Svartberg, Tapper, Temrin, Radesäter, & Thorman, 2005;cats, Felis catus, Bennett, Rutter, Woodhead, & Howell, 2017;nonhuman primates, Freeman & Gosling, 2010); reptiles and amphibians (Allard, Fuller,Torgerson-White, & Murray, 2015;Burghardt, 2013), and invertebrates (Kralj-Fišer & Schuett, 2014, for a review) show persistent individual differences that can be organized along core personality dimensions, many of which overlap with those found in humans (Gosling, 2008;Gosling & John, 1999). Vonk, Weiss, and Kuczaj (2017) offer a comprehensive and upto-date review of personality in nonhuman animals.…”
Section: Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, even when an individual is described using several personality traits, one cannot speak about behavioural syndromes, only about behavioural types (e.g. Herczeg et al 2009;David et al 2011). …”
Section: Main Concepts In Behavioural Syndrome Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%