1998
DOI: 10.1108/02683949810244947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality profiles of managers in former Soviet countries

Abstract: The research investigates the possibility that people in managerial positions in organisations in the former Soviet Union may not match western models of management, and may not be well suited to the new environment. The research finds many differences in psychological profile between FSU managers and western managers, and finds a common Soviet manager profile, which is a poor match to western models of management. The implications of this difference are discussed, and suggestions for coping with the differenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some published studies have used the term “profile” (i.e. Cook, Young, Taylor, O'Shea, Chitashvili, Lepeska, Choumentauskas, Ventskovsky, Hermochova, & Uhlar, 1998; Detrick & Chibnall, 2006), but none has assessed the viability of selection‐oriented profile matching. Rather, the term profile (as presented in the empirical literature‐base) represents a descriptive reference to several independently validated scales (see, for example, Detrick & Chibnall, 2006), and is therefore concerned with traditional univariate applications and not the procedural use of the term that is the focus of the current article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some published studies have used the term “profile” (i.e. Cook, Young, Taylor, O'Shea, Chitashvili, Lepeska, Choumentauskas, Ventskovsky, Hermochova, & Uhlar, 1998; Detrick & Chibnall, 2006), but none has assessed the viability of selection‐oriented profile matching. Rather, the term profile (as presented in the empirical literature‐base) represents a descriptive reference to several independently validated scales (see, for example, Detrick & Chibnall, 2006), and is therefore concerned with traditional univariate applications and not the procedural use of the term that is the focus of the current article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advocates of institutions argue that definite institutional environment (measured through property rights, rule of law, corruption, bureaucratic quality and other institutional variables) is the key precondition of economic development (Sachs 2003). They state, that the impact of geography on economic outcomes is only indirect, due to the impact geography makes on institutions, the main source of economic growth and development (Cook 1998). Five indexes were constructed by World Bank to measure the quality of institutional environment: Civil and political freedom index (CPFI), Regulatory and business freedom index (RBFI), Rule of law index (RLI), Corruption index (CI) and Property rights index (PRI).…”
Section: Freedom and Human Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11. See for example: Analoui (2000); Beer and Katz (2003); Cook et al (1998); Cook and Crossman (2004); Crossman and About-Zaki (2003); Gyula et al (2002); Sanyal and Guvenli (2004). 12.…”
Section: Worker Morale In Russiamentioning
confidence: 99%