1998
DOI: 10.1080/00224549809600422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality Structure Among Black and White South Africans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Heuchert et al's (2000) findings Heaven and Pretorius (1998) comparing a sample of Sotho and Afrikaans speaking students using John's (1990) natural language descriptors, were unable to recover the five factor structure for the Sotho group. Nonetheless, a clear Neuroticism factor was found for both, the Afrikaans and the Sotho language groups.…”
Section: Neuroticism Across Language Groupscontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to Heuchert et al's (2000) findings Heaven and Pretorius (1998) comparing a sample of Sotho and Afrikaans speaking students using John's (1990) natural language descriptors, were unable to recover the five factor structure for the Sotho group. Nonetheless, a clear Neuroticism factor was found for both, the Afrikaans and the Sotho language groups.…”
Section: Neuroticism Across Language Groupscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Other studies have focused on investigating the universality of the five-factor structure obtaining mixed results. Heaven and Pretorius (1998) found support for the five-factors in an Afrikaans-speaking student sample but failed to confirm the five-factor structure for the Sotho- The first study to comprehensively assess South Africa's cultural diversity was undertaken by Meiring et al (2005). The researchers applied the 15FQ+, an adapted version of the 15FQ designed to measure Cattell's 16 personality factors (Tyler, 2003) to 9 Black language groups and three other race groups, and detected construct bias and poor reliability in various indigenous African groups.…”
Section: Recent Studies Of Personality Assessment In South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Millonian approach seems only to be in accordance with a Western worldview. Research has demonstrated that African and Asian perspectives on personality differ vastly from Western perspectives (Church, 2000;Cheung, Cheung, Leung, Ward, & Leong, 2003;Heaven & Pretorius, 1998;McCrae & Terracciano, 2005;Teferi, 2004). Saraswathi (1998) argues that in the West the focus is on an independent, autonomous self characterised by motivation, analytical, abstract thinking, and an internal locus of control.…”
Section: Culture and The Millonian Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South Africa four studies have investigated the applicability of the model for South African population groups, but these studies produced conflicting results. Heaven, Connors and Stones (1994) did not find support for a five-factor structure when they applied a measure consisting of a list of trait adjectives proposed by John (1990) to 200 Black South African students, nor did Heaven and Pretorius (1998) succeed in doing so when translations of the adjectives were administered to 247 Black Sotho-speaking students. However, the same procedure for a sample of 155 Afrikaansspeaking students yielded a five-factor structure in support of the Big Five model.…”
Section: Deléne Visser J M Du Toitmentioning
confidence: 99%