Personalized Decision Making

Haward, Marlyse F.; Gaucher, Nathalie; Payot, Antoine; Robson, Kate; Janvier, Annie

doi:10.1016/j.clp.2017.01.006

Cited by 98 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 78 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Up to now, scholars have many opinions on its definition, but they have yet to reach a consensus [4,5]. e first is that the European Union and the OECD have defined the concept of rural tourism [6]. ey believe that tourism activities in rural regions are rural tourism and that the scale of such activities is often limited, and that locality is the foundation for rural tourism development [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personalized Recommendation of Rural Tourism Based on Traffic Classification and User Data Analysis

Wang

Zhang

2022

Security and Communication Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, With the development of global agricultural industrialization, modern agriculture has the functions of improving the quality of the ecological environment and providing people with the functions of sightseeing, leisure, and vacation. How to take the user as the center and combine the user’s personalized characteristics to offer the rural tourism products they need has become a research problem with real-world application value and challenge. In this context, this study develops an intelligent recommendation model by extensively analyzing the contents of rural tourism information platforms and product recommendation factors, as well as a rough set algorithm and traffic classification. To minimize the attributes of rural tourism product information and extract the core attribute, an attribute reduction approach based on a different matrix is implemented. Moreover, user interest similarity is computed and ranked to recommend rural tourist products. In addition, a personalized tourism attraction recommendation model is presented based on geographic area and period. The model achieved the highest average accuracy of 0.87%. The relevant experimental test results reveal that the system can provide accurate recommendations and services for rural tourism products.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personalized Recommendation of Rural Tourism Based on Traffic Classification and User Data Analysis

Wang

Zhang

2022

Security and Communication Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While there can never be one approach to encompass the needs of every family anticipating an extremely premature delivery, knowledge of general parental preferences is helpful for physicians tasked with providing information and empowering parents through a personalized decision-making process. 36 This study shows that even a group of relatively informed mothers, the majority of which reported having a previous premature infant and advanced education, did not report a solid understanding of commonly used medical terms and medical conditions associated with prematurity. This underscores the necessity to avoid medical jargon, even in situations where parents may be at an advantage due to past experience in a NICU or higher education level.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 72%

Maternal Preferences for Approach and Language Use During Antenatal Counseling at Extreme Prematurity: A Pilot Study

Holland

Kulp

Williams

et al. 2021

Journal of Neonatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Counseling families at risk for extremely preterm birth presents significant challenges to providers due to the uncertainty of infant outcomes. Aim: To determine lay-public parental preferences for approaches to prenatal counseling and preferred descriptive terminology usage by providers when discussing an anticipated extremely preterm delivery. Methods: This exploratory pilot study recruited parents through social media to participate in a survey centered around a hypothetical delivery at 23 weeks. Questions assessed participants’ understanding of medical terminology and preferences for terminology, discussion topics, and approaches to decision-making related to anticipated extremely preterm birth. Results: A total of 142 (72%) parents participated. Understanding of medical compared with nonmedical terminology was limited ( P < .01). Parents had stronger preferences for the use of certain words and terminology over others. They preferred discussions focused on the possibility of infant survival and information about intensive care, over general statistics, and outcome percentages. Most would choose attempted stabilization and neonatal intensive care unit care in this hypothetical case. Discussion/Conclusions: Parents have preferences regarding physician communication and approaches to decision-making around extremely preterm delivery, which may offer guidance to providers during counseling.

show abstract

“…The decision to provide active care could be broadened to other significant prognostic factors: birth weight, the administration of antenatal corticosteroids, sex, fetal anomalies, and so on. Currently, a trend toward personalizing care at the limits of viability is becoming visible: variation in parents' values and preferences is increasing, and so does the need for a "customization" in care (9,40). Nevertheless, this option would imply a care approach that is less uniform.…”

Section: Changing the Type Of The Guidelinementioning

confidence: 99%

The Edge of Perinatal Viability: Understanding the Dutch Position

Proost¹,

Verweij

M’hamdi³

et al. 2021

Front. Pediatr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current Dutch guideline on care at the edge of perinatal viability advises to consider initiation of active care to infants born from 24 weeks of gestational age on. This, only after extensive counseling of and shared decision-making with the parents of the yet unborn infant. Compared to most other European guidelines on this matter, the Dutch guideline may be thought to stand out for its relatively high age threshold of initiating active care, its gray zone spanning weeks 24 and 25 in which active management is determined by parental discretion, and a slight reluctance to provide active care in case of extreme prematurity. In this article, we explore the Dutch position more thoroughly. First, we briefly look at the previous and current Dutch guidelines. Second, we position them within the Dutch socio-cultural context. We focus on the Dutch prioritization of individual freedom, the abortion law and the perinatal threshold of viability, and a culturally embedded aversion of suffering. Lastly, we explore two possible adaptations of the Dutch guideline; i.e., to only lower the age threshold to consider the initiation of active care, or to change the type of guideline.

show abstract

Personalized Decision Making

Cited by 98 publications

References 78 publications

Personalized Recommendation of Rural Tourism Based on Traffic Classification and User Data Analysis

Personalized Recommendation of Rural Tourism Based on Traffic Classification and User Data Analysis

Maternal Preferences for Approach and Language Use During Antenatal Counseling at Extreme Prematurity: A Pilot Study

The Edge of Perinatal Viability: Understanding the Dutch Position

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About