2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2173011/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized Federated Learning with Model Interpolation among Client Clusters and its Application in Smart Home

Abstract: The proliferation of high-performance personal devices and the widespread deployment of machine learning (ML) applications have led to two consequences: the volume of private data from individuals or groups has exploded over the past few years; and the traditional central servers for training ML models have experienced communication and performance bottlenecks in the face of massive amounts of data. However, this reality also provides the possibility of keeping data local for ML training and fusing models on a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To contextualize and benchmark our findings, we conducted a comparative analysis in Table 5. We contrasted our results with those of prior studies that utilized analogous datasets, drawing upon the APPLE [16], FedFOMO [23], and FedSup [9] frameworks to train Non-DP FL models. This comparative exercise enabled us to gauge the relative effectiveness and privacy implications of our DP FL model in relation to its Non-DP FL counterparts utilized in previous research endeavors.…”
Section: B Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To contextualize and benchmark our findings, we conducted a comparative analysis in Table 5. We contrasted our results with those of prior studies that utilized analogous datasets, drawing upon the APPLE [16], FedFOMO [23], and FedSup [9] frameworks to train Non-DP FL models. This comparative exercise enabled us to gauge the relative effectiveness and privacy implications of our DP FL model in relation to its Non-DP FL counterparts utilized in previous research endeavors.…”
Section: B Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Pathological Non-IID setting is intended to assess how well FL algorithms perform under extremely non-IID conditions, while the Practical Non-IID setting aims to replicate a more realistic scenario seen in medical applications where institutes located in different regions may have datasets with varying sizes and imbalanced distributions due to different demographic distributions of patients and categories of data. (Table 1) compares their results to [23]'s results under practical Non-IID settings. [24], techniques for preserving privacy were reviewed in conjunction with machine learning, and subsequently applied in the classification of chest X-rays and segmentation of CT scans.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in [23] proposed a new approach to personalized federated learning. The authors introduce a method for efficiently calculating optimal weighted model combinations for each client, based on determining how much a client can benefit from a model trained on other clients' data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The others are dedicated to improve the mixture of global and local model. There are many ways to help the local models to mix the global model including L2GD [17], AL2GD [18] and many other methods [7, 19–22]. And certainly, there are also lots of papers studying the personalised federated learning using clustering methods [8, 23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%