2023
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2023.3247563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized Latent Structure Learning for Recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, content-based filtering and unattended learning models offer insightful analysis of specific playlist features. This allows for the provision of recommendations categorized by genre, artist, and even mixed suggestions [51,52]. The overarching objective of these personalized music recommendation systems is to elevate user satisfaction and optimize recommendation effectiveness, thus enriching the overall listening experience.…”
Section: G Personalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, content-based filtering and unattended learning models offer insightful analysis of specific playlist features. This allows for the provision of recommendations categorized by genre, artist, and even mixed suggestions [51,52]. The overarching objective of these personalized music recommendation systems is to elevate user satisfaction and optimize recommendation effectiveness, thus enriching the overall listening experience.…”
Section: G Personalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And so on, the historical features saved in the š‘˜-th epoch will be used to calculate the orthogonal direction used in the š‘˜ + 1-th epoch. [6,39,40] shows that in the training of classification models, only 5 epochs are usually needed to make the shift of features small enough. And š‘˜ is significantly larger than 5, so there is no need to be concerned about the feature shift not being small enough.…”
Section: End-to-end Training With Ourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-tailed recognition is an important challenge in computer vision, manifested by models trained on long-tailed data that tend to perform poorly for classes with few samples. Previous research has attributed this phenomenon to the fact that the few samples in the tail classes do not well represent their true distribution, resulting in a shift between the test and training domains [4,31,40]. Numerous methods have been proposed to mitigate model bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%