2016
DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2016.1216163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized medicine in psychiatry

Abstract: Personalized medicine in psychiatry is challenged by the current taxonomy, where the diagnostic categories are broad and great biological heterogeneity exists within each category. There is, thus, a gap between the current advanced research prospects and clinical practice, and the current taxonomy is, thus, a poor basis for biological research. The discussion proposes possible solutions to narrow this gap and to move psychiatric research forward towards personalized medicine.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…31,36,46,49,50,[58][59][60] Our research data provide further evidence that the treatment decisions for the individual schizophrenic patients are more correct if they are guided by the objectively measured LMPs. 4,5 Such an objective and quantitative evaluation at a single-patient level is in line with the modern tendency for personalized 36,61,62 and precision 63,64 medicine in the psychiatric neuroscience research, aimed at replacing the traditional categorical diagnostic approach with a more dimensional one 64-68 that looks for "theranostic" 69 rather than for diagnostic biomarkers. 67,68 It is interesting to note that just in the last few years the motor dimension was proposed to be included in the translational psychiatric neuroscience research.…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of the Translational Equilibriometrimentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…31,36,46,49,50,[58][59][60] Our research data provide further evidence that the treatment decisions for the individual schizophrenic patients are more correct if they are guided by the objectively measured LMPs. 4,5 Such an objective and quantitative evaluation at a single-patient level is in line with the modern tendency for personalized 36,61,62 and precision 63,64 medicine in the psychiatric neuroscience research, aimed at replacing the traditional categorical diagnostic approach with a more dimensional one 64-68 that looks for "theranostic" 69 rather than for diagnostic biomarkers. 67,68 It is interesting to note that just in the last few years the motor dimension was proposed to be included in the translational psychiatric neuroscience research.…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of the Translational Equilibriometrimentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As mentioned before, every single schizophrenic patient might combine prototypical schizotaxic LMPs (indicating locomotor ataxia) with atypical nonschizotaxic ones (indicating either hypolocomotion or hyperlocomotion). Evaluating such subclinical combinations of qualitative and quantitative locomotor abnormalities could allow us to make more reliable predictions for more appropriate drug therapy and its more accurate dosage, which might lead to individualized or personalized treatment strategies . On the other hand, the diversity of possible locomotor combinations could explain why the individual reactions to one and the same antipsychotic treatment might vary from patient to patient and why these individual reactions are more predictable by objective evaluation of the patient's motor abnormalities .…”
Section: Translational Implications Of the Objective Locomotor Evaluamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second plan of the project was to utilize existing Finnish biobanks in the PSYCOHORTS consortium. Combining pure biological data from biobanks with large cohort data will help identify biomedical patterns that predict diagnosis and phenotypes with high accuracy, which is the major goal of personalized medicine [50].…”
Section: Plans and Perspectives Of Psycohortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneity in symptoms, course, and etiology of disorders is recognized as a profound challenge in studying psychopathology (Dacquino et al , 2015, Geschwind & Flint, 2015, Hines et al , 2005, Lee et al , 2016, Milaneschi et al , 2016, Wium-Andersen et al , 2017). Although this challenge makes gene identification a particularly difficult undertaking, it is hypothesized to be overcome by “brute force” approaches with large sample sizes, as described above (e.g.…”
Section: Post-gwas Areas Of Exploration From a Developmental Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%