2023
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized pain management: The relationship between clinical relevance and reliability of measurements

Abstract: Reliability is a topic in health science in which a critical appraisal of the magnitudes of the measurements is often left aside to favour a formulaic analysis. Furthermore, the relationship between clinical relevance and reliability of measurements is often overlooked. In this context, the aim of the present article is to provide an overview of the design and analysis of reliability studies, the interpretation of the reliability of measurements and its relationship to clinical significance in the context of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary outcome was the change in pain intensity after the intervention using analogue scale (VAS), numeric rating scale (NRS) and Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD). We utilized the standard error of measurement to denote reliability, as outlined by Mista et al (2023). The standard errors of measurement for VAS (0-100 mm), NRS (score 0-10) and NPAD (score 0-100) were reported as 7.7 mm (MacDowall et al, 2018), 0.99-1.1 (Young et al, 2019) and 17.1 (Dabiri et al, 2023), respectively.…”
Section: Primary Outcome Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome was the change in pain intensity after the intervention using analogue scale (VAS), numeric rating scale (NRS) and Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD). We utilized the standard error of measurement to denote reliability, as outlined by Mista et al (2023). The standard errors of measurement for VAS (0-100 mm), NRS (score 0-10) and NPAD (score 0-100) were reported as 7.7 mm (MacDowall et al, 2018), 0.99-1.1 (Young et al, 2019) and 17.1 (Dabiri et al, 2023), respectively.…”
Section: Primary Outcome Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While substantial progress has been made in perioperative pain management, there are areas that warrant further investigation. Notably, personalized approaches to pain management, including pharmacogenetics, hold potential for optimizing pain control while minimizing adverse effects (Mista et al, 2023). The impact of emerging technologies, such as ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, on patient outcomes and safety remains an area of ongoing exploration (Sites et al, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%