2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-37157-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized Persuasive Technology – Development and Validation of Scales for Measuring Persuadability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scores on importance of social comparison [17] are in the medium range (Mean 3.19, STD 0.84, again scale from 1 to 5). On average the user group also had a rather high ICT-competence [25]: Mean 1.99, STD 0.50, scale poled inverse to prior ones with 1 indicating high and 5 low competence.…”
Section: Research Questions and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scores on importance of social comparison [17] are in the medium range (Mean 3.19, STD 0.84, again scale from 1 to 5). On average the user group also had a rather high ICT-competence [25]: Mean 1.99, STD 0.50, scale poled inverse to prior ones with 1 indicating high and 5 low competence.…”
Section: Research Questions and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further explore which factors actually underlie the users willingness to participate in challenges we analyzed the data using a multiple linear regression approach with the number of challenges participated as independent variable. As dependent variables we used basic demographics (sex, age), ICT-competence, Environmental concern (measured using the scale provided in [18]) and a score of importance of the dimension of social comparison (based on [17]). This resulted in an overall marginally significant model (F 5,31 =2.326, p=0.066, adjusted r 2 =0.156).…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, research in persuasive technology has turned towards personalisation [12,16]. The concept of persuadability [12] describes an individual's susceptibility to a specific persuasive strategy and methods to measure persuadability have been developed [4,5]. Thus, looking again at transport research, a BCSS should focus on an individual's persuadability for greater efficiency and impact.…”
Section: Persuasive Technologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Wiafe and Nakata [5] reviewed the papers which were presented in the International Conferences on Persuasive Technology from 2006 to 2010 and identified feedback, simulation, suggestion, self-monitoring, reward, and social roles as the most frequently used persuasive strategies in the persuasive designs related to environmental issues. In the context of the Peacox project (Busch et al [28]), personalized mobile or web tools are designed to persuade people to travel in an eco-friendly way. Corbett [29] analyzed the persuasive design principles used in the Carbon Management Systems (CMS), which is designed and used in organizations to persuade employees toward environmental behaviors.…”
Section: Cases Of Design For Energy-saving Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the 28 persuasive strategies proposed by Oinas-Kukkonen and Harjumaa [6], two more persuasive strategies are identified, including a strategy called "creating of awareness" mentioned in Busch et al [28] and a strategy called "goal-setting" mentioned in Gabrielli et al [9] and Malhotra et al [31].…”
Section: Screening Relevant Persuasive Strategies and Questionnaire Dmentioning
confidence: 99%