2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2009.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Personalizing” academic medicine: opportunities and challenges in implementing genomic profiling

Abstract: BCM faculty members spearheaded development of a first generation Personal Genome Profile (Baylor PGP) assay to assist physicians in diagnosing and managing patients in this new era of medicine. The principles that are guiding the design and implementation of the Baylor PGP are high quality, robustness, low expense, flexibility, practical clinical utility and the ability to facilitate broad areas of clinical research. The single most distinctive feature of the approach taken is an emphasis on extensive screeni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These PGM tests are offered by private and academic laboratories and generally require pretest counseling by a physician or counselor with documentation of such on the request and consent forms. The approach taken by most institutions is to emphasize extensive screening for rare disease-causing mutations rather than testing common risk-modifying variants of small effect size (108). The boundary between risk-modifying SNPs and actionable disease genotypes is not sharp.…”
Section: Personalized Genomic Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These PGM tests are offered by private and academic laboratories and generally require pretest counseling by a physician or counselor with documentation of such on the request and consent forms. The approach taken by most institutions is to emphasize extensive screening for rare disease-causing mutations rather than testing common risk-modifying variants of small effect size (108). The boundary between risk-modifying SNPs and actionable disease genotypes is not sharp.…”
Section: Personalized Genomic Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These early demonstrations of the clinical promise of genomic analyses suggest that NGS tools will be adopted first by physicians who are consulted to assist in providing a diagnosis for patients with complex clinical presentations, particularly in cases where genetic contributions are suspected but have proven difficult to identify [6]. Examples of such scenarios might include patients presenting with neurological problems of unknown origins or with complex cancer histories that are suggestive of multiple genetic contributions [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The establishment of a standard assay allowing the precise discrimination of highly homologous genes using a small amount of sample would help to produce a clearer, more unified picture of MDR [48]. Moreover, it would undoubtedly lead to progress not only in understanding the mechanisms governing MDR but also in the translation of this knowledge to clinical practice, especially in personalized medicine [49]. …”
Section: Towards a Standard Diagnostic Assay For Translational Resmentioning
confidence: 99%