Personnel’s Experiences of Phlebotomy Practices after Participating in an Educational Intervention Programme

Abstract

Background. Blood specimen collection is a common procedure in health care, and the results from specimen analysis have essential influence on clinical decisions. Errors in phlebotomy may lead to repeated sampling and delay in diagnosis and may jeopardise patient safety. This study aimed to describe the experiences of, and reflections on, phlebotomy practices of phlebotomy personnel working in primary health care after participating in an educational intervention programme (EIP). Methods. Thirty phlebotomists from ten primary health care centres participated. Their experiences were investigated through face-to-face interviews. Findings were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results. The participants perceived the EIP as having opened up opportunities to reflect on safety. The EIP had made them aware of risks in relation to identification procedures, distractions from the environment, lack of knowledge, and transfer of information. The EIP also resulted in improvements in clinical practice, such as a standardised way of working and increased accuracy. Some said that the training had reassured them to continue working as usual, while others continued as usual regardless of incorrect procedure. Conclusions. The findings show that EIP can stimulate reflections on phlebotomy practices in larger study groups. Increased knowledge of phlebotomy practices improves the opportunities to revise and maximise the quality and content of future EIPs. Educators and safety managers should reflect on and pay particular attention to the identification procedure, distractions from the environment, and transfer of information, when developing and implementing EIPs. The focus of phlebotomy training should not solely be on improving adherence to practice guidelines.

The opinions of ambulance personnel regarding using a heated mattress for patients being cared for in a cold climate – An intervention study in ambulance care

“…However, the anonymous uncoded data collection at group level probably contributed to a more candid estimate from the informants, since there would otherwise be a risk of bias because the data collection was performed at the same workplace, where two of the authors work on and off. Introducing new procedures can meet with some resistance and for some people it can be hard to change their behaviour, which can be explained by passivity and low motivation [40]. In this study, participation was high, which could indicate that the personnel consider this field of research to be interesting and that there is a need for new products to prevent chilling of patients in ambulance care.…”

Questionnaire survey: The process of quality management in the preanalytical phase of laboratory examination in the department of joint laboratories

“…The study compared information retrieval, tube labeling, and test requirements management procedures in 70 primary care centers compared to the same procedures for staff in two clinical laboratories. The study showed that good practice was not always followed, and its practical recommendation was to set up a training program (Bölenius et al, 2014). In 2009-2010, an extensive training program for venous blood sampling procedures took place in Sweden.…”

Nurses’ Experiences of Blood Sample Collection from Children: A Qualitative Study from Swedish Paediatric Hospital Care

“…This highlights the wide range of issues a paediatric nurse must cope with when executing blood sampling. Nurses in other clinical contexts have also described con icting emotions when they deviate from instructions, have to hold patients still or when parents interfere during their children's blood sampling (34). To assure the safety of the child and protect its rights, nurses must use their clinical judgement in each situation and for each individual child so that they can appropriately tailor the best preparations and interventions, before, during and after the procedure (35).…”