A society that permits biology to become an engineering discipline, that allows that science to slip into the role of changing the living world without trying to understand it, is a danger to itself.-Carl R. Woese (2004: 173) This paper is a plea for considering scientific perspectivism as the appropriate philosophical stance to deal with a number of epistemological, methodological, and ontological challenges modelers of complex, multi-scale phenomena are facing. Broadly speaking, perspectivism is the philosophical position that one's access to the world^ through perception, experience, a«(i reason is possible only through one's own perspective and interpretation.^ Scientific perspectivism extends this position to scientific ^ I am only dealing with external reality here, not with the 'world' of our subjective experiences, which is only accessible through introspection. Wimsatt (2007) discusses the differences between a first-, second-, and third-person perspective on 'reality'-the latter perspective being the only one sanctioned by mainstream science and epistemology-and their interrelations. ^ According to Edgar Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf , the language one speaks determines the way one will interpret the/one's world. Perspectivism as understood in linguistics, social psychology, psychiatry, etc., cannot be considered here.