Perspectival representation in DSGE models

Kawalec, Paweł

doi:10.18559/ebr.2017.3.5

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(Kawalec 2018b)). Other examples of threads studied in greater detail in our earlier publications include cholera research (Kawalec 2006(Kawalec , 2018a, economic growth models (Kawalec 2016(Kawalec , 2017a, and the science of science studies (Kawalec 2019).…”

Section: Knowledge Threadsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Knowledge Routines, Threads and Network Dynamics

Kawalec

2022

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper focuses on knowledge generation, a topic frequently overlooked in the traditional debates in epistemology and philosophy of science. We focus on investigation as the primary process generating knowledge and its products. Investigation is taken as a generalization of the research process that includes similar knowledge-generating practices in aboriginal communities. To characterize the complexity of investigation processes and their products we go beyond traditional epistemological characterization of knowledge in terms of mental states and turn to the concept of routine. Investigation processes share a common symbolic representation form which we call here a knowledge thread. The dynamics of the knowledge thread may be characterized by two intertwined tiers: cognitive and institutional. Using examples from our previous studies, especially on the recent discovery of microRNAs in molecular biology, we illustrate the dynamics of threads and claim that it is susceptible to the social network analysis which, however, requires insightful applications and sound interpretation of the results. Such an interpretation, as we suggest, may further be elaborated on the grounds of anthropological theories of distributed agency and distributed cognition.

show abstract

Section: Knowledge Threadsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Knowledge Routines, Threads and Network Dynamics

Kawalec

2022

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Methodology…?! Why? Some methodological aspects of the controversy between mainstream economics and institutionalism

Galbács¹

2017

EBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

: Mainstream economics has been running the gauntlet of adverse criticism for decades. These critiques claim as a message of central importance that mainstream economics has lost its relevance for understanding reality. By making a brief comparison between the methodological strategies of the main stream and institutional economics I suggest that the firm demarcation between the streams stems from the difference between their methodologies. Its peculiar interest directed mainstream economics to take a unique methodological path and consequently the adherents have not been able to be on the lookout for certain facets of socio-economic reality. However, the chosen path, the axiomatic-deductive strategy proved to be an appropriate method for identifying economic laws. This claim is justified even by some recent efforts of new institutional economics. In order to support the conversation between the schools I highlight some causes that currently make it impossible to start a rational discourse.

show abstract

Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa

Kawalec

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perspectival representation in DSGE models

Cited by 3 publications

References 45 publications

Knowledge Routines, Threads and Network Dynamics

Knowledge Routines, Threads and Network Dynamics

Methodology…?! Why? Some methodological aspects of the controversy between mainstream economics and institutionalism

Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About