2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspective: Bonding and electronic origin of Au atomic-undercoordination-derivacy and nanoscale-size-dependency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This unusual selectivity toward the Au−N bonding is likely due to the unique nanostructure of the metal surface created by the STM-BJ technique. 36,37 Similar Au−N bonding reactions are also observed for other iminyl radicals with different backbone lengths (Figures 4b,c, S10, and S11). For instance, monophenylene-and terphenylene-substituted aminyl radicals generated through photolysis of oxime esters Al-1 and Al-3 can also bind to Au electrodes and lead to the formation of similar covalent Au−N bonded single-molecule junctions.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This unusual selectivity toward the Au−N bonding is likely due to the unique nanostructure of the metal surface created by the STM-BJ technique. 36,37 Similar Au−N bonding reactions are also observed for other iminyl radicals with different backbone lengths (Figures 4b,c, S10, and S11). For instance, monophenylene-and terphenylene-substituted aminyl radicals generated through photolysis of oxime esters Al-1 and Al-3 can also bind to Au electrodes and lead to the formation of similar covalent Au−N bonded single-molecule junctions.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…However, our STM-BJ measurements based on oxime ester precursors only show signals of the Au–N bonded single-molecule junctions, indicating that the possible side reactions may occur to a very limited extent. This unusual selectivity toward the Au–N bonding is likely due to the unique nanostructure of the metal surface created by the STM-BJ technique. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spherical Cu-Au nanoparticles with different sizes might exhibit both atomically ordered and atomically disordered structures, and nanoparticles form the core-shell structure as the degree of atomically ordered increases [21]. The lattice strains and vacancies exist in the surface shell layers, while the internal cores have the similar atomic structure as the bulk material [28,29]. The main potential function applied an embedded atom method (EAM) potential for the binary Cu-Au system developed by Gola [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the R is not limited to H but any atom less electronegative, such as the situation of the four-stage O:Cu−O bond formation and relaxation in the Cu(001; 110) surface chemisorption. 27 It is expected the HBCP and the BOLS regulations are dominant in single-atom catalysis 29 and the topological and high-T C superconductivity. 30 DFT computations derive information on the O:H−N segmental length and the bond angle relaxation and intramolecular electron redistribution as well under compression, 31 in terms of the bond order: 32…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the R is not limited to H but any atom less electronegative, such as the situation of the four-stage O:Cu–O bond formation and relaxation in the Cu(001; 110) surface chemisorption . It is expected the HBCP and the BOLS regulations are dominant in single-atom catalysis and the topological and high- T C superconductivity …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%