2005
DOI: 10.1080/10503300512331327056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspective divergence in the working alliance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
73
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
14
73
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of a general rating of the relationship, it was observed that the therapists' ratings were moderately correlated with their clients' rating; however, the therapists' ratings were observed to be signifi cantly lower. The observed low levels of convergence found in this study match the results from previous studies examining levels of convergence for ratings of the therapeutic alliance (Clemence et al, 2005;Fitzpatrick et al, 2005;Tryon et al, 2007). Consensus, collaboration and agreement, especially when it comes to the goals and tasks of therapy, have repeatedly been emphasized as key aspects of the therapeutic alliance (Bordin, 1976(Bordin, , 1994Gaston et al, 1995;Hovarth & Bedi, 2002;Lambert & Ogles, 2004;Tryon & Winograd, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of a general rating of the relationship, it was observed that the therapists' ratings were moderately correlated with their clients' rating; however, the therapists' ratings were observed to be signifi cantly lower. The observed low levels of convergence found in this study match the results from previous studies examining levels of convergence for ratings of the therapeutic alliance (Clemence et al, 2005;Fitzpatrick et al, 2005;Tryon et al, 2007). Consensus, collaboration and agreement, especially when it comes to the goals and tasks of therapy, have repeatedly been emphasized as key aspects of the therapeutic alliance (Bordin, 1976(Bordin, , 1994Gaston et al, 1995;Hovarth & Bedi, 2002;Lambert & Ogles, 2004;Tryon & Winograd, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, Fitzpatrick, Iwakabe and Stalikas (2005) recently had 48 client-therapist dyads separately complete the Working Alliance Inventory (Horvath & Greenberg, 1986) after every second or third session. Results from this study indicated that client and therapist ratings of the alliance were signifi cantly divergent, that the divergence was greater for ratings of goal and task agreement and that the level of divergence did not change over the course of therapy.…”
Section: Findings On Client-therapist Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, clients' and counsellors' perspectives of the alliance can diverge significantly (Bachelor & Salame´, 2000;Fitzpatrick, Iwakabe, & Stalikas, 2005), and there is evidence that clientdirected counselling (counselling that is driven by direct client feedback) is highly effective in establishing a strong early alliance (Duncan & Miller, 2000;Duncan et al, 2003). Thus, educators and counsellors may lack the empirical evidence necessary to maximize their potential for developing strong alliances and improving counselling outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Another study showed that client and therapist perspectives on the working alliance do not necessarily correspond well, with the therapist's evaluation having a lower correlation with post-session outcomes (Fitzpatrick, Stalikas, & Iwakabe, 2005). In addition, client perspective is crucial in understanding phenomena such as premature terminations, therapeutic failures, and alliance ruptures.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%