Perspectives and Experiences of Smartphone Overuse among University Students in Umm Al-Qura University (UQU), Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Analysis

Abstract

Smartphone overuse and addiction is a growing concern worldwide. However, there are limited studies about smartphone addiction and its impacts on university students in Saudi Arabia. This qualitative study aimed to elicit students’ and university staff’s perspectives and experiences about smartphone overuse/addiction in Umm Al-Qura University (UQU), Saudi Arabia. Fifteen undergraduate students and 18 university staff (13 lecturers and five professionals) were recruited for the purpose of this study. The study data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. The qualitative data comprising 33 participants (students and staff) identified four major themes including the perception of smartphone use; causes of smartphone overuse; negative impacts of smartphone overuse; and strategies to reduce the overuse of smartphone. The overall findings confirmed that students and staff alike held both positive and negative perceptions about using a smartphone. Potential factors leading to smartphone overuse included personal factors (extended free time and low self-confidence, irresponsibility/escaping certain social gatherings/passing the time); smartphone factors (reasonable price, attractive advertisements (ads), and engaging smartphone Apps); and social factors (social pressure and fear of losing a connection). The main negative impacts of smartphone overuse were found to be related to low academic productivity, poor physical health (body pain, lack of sleep, and low exercise), compromised mental well-being (stress and negative emotions), and decreased socialisation (social isolation and a reduction in face-to-face communication). Our findings suggested that awareness campaigns about smartphone overuse, promoting family and social events, encouraging physical activities, and limiting internet use can reduce smartphone usage among university students. This finding has significant implications for decision-makers.

Problematic Smartphone Use Leads to Behavioral and Cognitive Self-Control Deficits

“…These processes are key factors in the transition from voluntary/goal-directed actions (with an appraisal of action consequences) to habitual actions (seemingly automatic and uncontrolled), which is at the basis of addictive behaviors [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Another model, the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE), proposes that PIU behaviors may be explained by looking at interactions between predisposing factors (e.g., impulsivity, anxiety, depression, general distress), moderators (e.g., coping style, self-regulatory capacities, and internet-related attentional and cognitive biases), and mediators such as reduced inhibitory control in combination with reduced executive functioning and diminished decision making [ 39 , 40 , 41 ]. As previously mentioned, due to accessibility and portability, the connection between the internet and smartphone use is more insidious and pervasive [ 21 , 22 ].…”

Mental health outcomes and socio-demographics as determinants of students' academic performance and smartphone addiction at the University of Cape Coast

“…Earlier studies have indicated that tertiary education students are the fastest adopters of smartphone technology [19,3]. It has been reported that university students are addicted to smartphone usage, a phenomenon that takes about 6-8 hours of their time daily [6,7].…”

Smartphone usage and its associated behaviours among undergraduate medical students in Pakistan

“…The behavioral patterns identi ed through the study re ect a multifaceted relationship between students and their smartphones. While these devices serve as vital tools for information access, communication, education, and entertainment, the downside is a range of behaviors suggesting overreliance and potential addiction [3]. These behaviors have signi cant implications, including integration into almost every aspect of lifestyle, risk of addiction, shifts in social interaction preferences, as well as various negative physical and psychological effects [4,5].…”